zoossh,
this brings up an interesting debate that was ongoing in between all those flame wars in clubsnap few days back.
what and who to critique ? quite a few people in clubsnap are equipped with a good eye for photographic detail. many a time, they hold back their comments - either not to offend the owner of the photos or they just don't feel inclined to waste their precious time or maybe they even have some sort of insecurity feeling that by providing intelligent critique the photographer might improve (i might be totally wrong on this one, so there is no need to flame me). everyone is entitled to an opinion, and so do i.
one can only critique when one is equipped to critique - where one really finds some room for improvement. photogs like me are still beginners, we ourselves are learning and many a time we are overcome with awe at the photographs we see on clubsnap. maybe 5 years from now, we might think this quality of photographs are trash material. for now, i can't find too many faults with your photos, so other than posting comments of encouragement and showing your photos to other friends, i can't add much value.
sorry for the aside, let's get back to your interesting photos. it feels good when someone explains the technicalities of the shot, the thought process that went into that shot and what he/she feels is wrong with his/her own picture. gives others pointers to improve. thanks.