litechaser
Senior Member
he's downright wasting the cam

Some rich folk think that having lots of $$ gets them 'instant power-up' into the next level of photography, which is sadly... not the case.
he's downright wasting the cam![]()
in a simple explanation; fashion photography is selling a style, a trend, and apparel, noting about the person(model) itself.hi catchlights,
hope to hear your expert opinion on sellable photo is ≠ a good photo...
in cs's pnp section, i often see comments like , this is overexposed, underexpose... but i saw these "mistakes" (overexposed, underexpose...) in magazines...
so lately i have this idea, perhaps a good portrait is usually not a fashion portrait.. in a good (or should i say traditional or formal portrait) there are many rules.. but in fashion, they do not follow the rules strictly for sake of attractiveness...
i am not sure if this idea is correct or not....
anyway for me, there is only a good or bad photo... a good pic could be overexposed, but it is still better than a lousy correct pic... that's my view now ;p
look forward to the expert opinions of you and other gurus
in a simple explanation; fashion photography is selling a style, a trend, and apparel, noting about the person(model) itself.
a portrait is showing a likeness of a person.
in a good fashion photo, human is always just a props.
in a good portrait, wardrobe is just to complement the person.
-------------
as for the "mistake", some "mistake" in a photo is showing the incompetent of the photographer, as this, we simply label it as "mistake"
as for some photos, the "mistake" is being created deliberately or left it there, as in part of a design element in a photo. so we don't label them as "mistake".
eg, subject or camera movement is always no no in most photos, but it can use it to create a sense of dynamic of the photo if it uses correctly.
--------------
there are many rules in art/design/photography etc, rules has being set and use, is we learn how we perceive things around us over the human history.
we can break the rule when we want to convey a message in another way, but we must first learn how the rules affect us before we can use or break them,
using/breaking it wisely, we are an artist.
but don't break the rule for the sake of breaking it.
If you can take good photos, expensive equipment are like icing on the cake. If you can't take good photos, nothing can help you.
I encourage people to buy expensive equipment to drive the photography industry, so that stuffs would be cheaper. lol.
We have budget entry dslr which is under a k now, isn't it? =)
budget entry dlsr's will soon be under $500 (new).![]()
Was chatting with a doctor (in private practice) friend of mine and the subject turned to photography. Turns out that he has a $10K Leica M9 with several $4-$5K Leica lens. He uses a Leica X1 ($2000+) as his compact and a top-end Canon EOS as his "DSLR backup" (I assume with the pre-requisite pro lens). At that point, I shut up. Sigh...
gd ! Buy more sell more so that there will be cheap prices in the Buy and Sell !![]()