D600 Full Frame announced! (not official yet)

[rain5533]

I concur with my fellow cake xD

The true form of bro rain

Jokes aside, I sure hope it has a front dial, built in motor and many buttons to press press press! I'm addicted to pressing buttons

http://www.flickr.com/photos/oneida_lkf/7936868738/

Ha ha...

Don't laugh the front dial very important for me.
Now do u know why I'd switch from canon..

 

[xtemujin]

I just hope that the stock situation will be greatly improved for the launch of thr D600.

I'm getting sick and tired of waiting for the next few batches to come in.

 

[nikoneer]

even if it has 89% viewfinder coverage i will still buy it

 

[rain5533]

even if it has 89% viewfinder coverage i will still buy it

Viewfinder coverage: 100% for FX , 97% for Dx

Read more on NikonRumors.com: New/updated Nikon D600 specifications | Nikon Rumors

 

[Fudgecakes]

Ha ha...

Don't laugh the front dial very important for me.
Now do u know why I'd switch from canon..

-chants- front dial front dial front dial~

I just hope that the stock situation will be greatly improved for the launch of thr D600.

I'm getting sick and tired of waiting for the next few batches to come in.

Haha. Unless Nikon was warehouses full of D600s by photokina, you can bet preorder lines will be GINORMOUS

even if it has 89% viewfinder coverage i will still buy it

I won't. Haha. It must have buttons, front dial, weather sealing and 100% accuracy pentaprism.

 

[Fudgecakes]

Viewfinder coverage: 100% for FX , 97% for Dx

Read more on NikonRumors.com: New/updated Nikon D600 specifications | Nikon Rumors

You sure it's not the other way around?

 

[rain5533]

You sure it's not the other way around?

double confirm..
nowadays still have same specs as D700?

BTW just go an update your NX Capture 2.3.4, that's what i can do now... :dunno:

 

[spree86]

ayio bro i also have trouble understanding you sometimes. not to offend you or what la, just saying

i would love to get the D600 but i wanna see the real features it has first before selling my beloved D7k and buying this baby

Haha I thought I was the only one that don't understand what rain is saying most of the time. Sometimes I don't reply because I don't understand:bsmilie: No offence to rain

 

[Fudgecakes]

double confirm..
nowadays still have same specs as D700?

BTW just go an update your NX Capture 2.3.4, that's what i can do now... :dunno:

But how can the Dx view not be 100% on a full frame camera but the FX view can be 100%? doesn't make sense leh haha

Haha I thought I was the only one that don't understand what rain is saying most of the time. Sometimes I don't reply because I don't understand:bsmilie: No offence to rain

Haha not an isolated problem. But uncle rain's phone screen is too small for him to check his spelling properly. So 体谅 abit la xD

 

[rain5533]

But how can the Dx view not be 100% on a full frame camera but the FX view can be 100%? doesn't make sense leh haha



Haha not an isolated problem. But uncle rain's phone screen is too small for him to check his spelling properly. So 体谅 abit la xD

The main FX is design for FX lenses, why not they still bother so much in DX line?
since they not like canon totally can't be used.. that was very lucky already..
btw i'll still keep my DX zoom lens for when i'm wanna go for travel use.

 

[Fudgecakes]

The main FX is design for FX lenses, why not they still bother so much in DX line?
since they not like canon totally can't be used.. that was very lucky already..
btw i'll still keep my DX zoom lens for when i'm wanna go for travel use.

No but in dx view on an fx camera, why not just let there be 100% coverage since it just involves cropping off part the image circle? If 95% on fc view to cut cost I can understand but why intentionally reduce the dx view when it will not incur more cost?

 

[rain5533]

No but in dx view on an fx camera, why not just let there be 100% coverage since it just involves cropping off part the image circle? If 95% on fc view to cut cost I can understand but why intentionally reduce the dx view when it will not incur more cost?

hmm maybe is an called low cost FF camera of entry level..

BTW how long do you can shoots with DX Lenses in FX Body?

 

[Fudgecakes]

hmm maybe is an called low cost FF camera of entry level..

BTW how long do you can shoots with DX Lenses in FX Body?

What do u mean? :O

 

[daredevil123]

I am totally lost now... on the less than 100% DX view on FX body...

 

[nikoneer]

What do u mean? :O

rain's lovable english.... makes our brain work hard to decipher...

 

[rain5533]

What do u mean? :O

1st. You can compare with D700 specs.
How bout the VF in full time viewing at 95%?

2nd the D600.
What I can provide all in rumors specs.
On the VF in FX 100% with DX 97%.

3rd unless you wanna stick with D7000 in 100% VF.

(since you wanna think to jump over FX bodies and you still mind the DX offered with 97% VF on crop mode?)

Thanks

 

[rain5533]

rain's lovable english.... makes our brain work hard to decipher...

Maybe sometime I'd felt them didn't compare the overall..

Just too much focus on the single topic.

 

[Cheesecake]

Maybe sometime I'd felt them didn't compare the overall..

Just too much focus on the single topic.

nvm, we just get ready to buybuybuy when its available!


will be a very good free-n-easy camera.

 

[rain5533]

I am totally lost now... on the less than 100% DX view on FX body...

Sorry. You catch no ball.

We talk about Viewfinder on D600.
In rumors specs is mention on VF for FX 100% and when used with DX can viewing of 97% only.

Anywhere still better than D700 for only 95% at all.

 

[ageha]

Why should anybody want to shoot with a DX lens on a 24MP only full-frame body anyway?