Koelsch said:I'm a good boy alright! I loan friends money and yet they betrayed the trust and refused and gave so many excuses not to return the money he owned me like two years ago.
VR2 said:18-200mm VR shd be a good lens for u as it almost cover all ranges for yr indoor shots..
waiting for mine to come.. :sweat:
wo teng ze ni hui lai, wo teng ze ni hui lai.. :lovegrin:
espn said:So? Who cares... they can wait, wait lor, else I can always go home direct from KT, I got direct bus :bsmilie:
Jln Damai... right across where I work :bsmilie:
If flash is a no-no, then a VR lens is the way to go. You might want to consider what espn has suggested, the 70-200/2.8 VR. The aperture of f/2.8 will give you more light so that you can use a shorter exposure time and the VR will additionally prevent camera shakes. However, this lens can set you back quite a bit.Koelsch said:i don't think i would need the flash right now. ALL events that i'm covering are mostly gaming events and flashs are not advisable. yeah i did consider those lenses. hmmms it's hard to decide with range of lenses.
oh well. shall get my d50 and start attending courses and taking more shots before i get my lens and flashes. anyway thanks espn. seems that you stick by your comp like forever lol :devil:
16FE also, you forgotTMC said:get 20mm, 50mm and 85mm. then you are set for a no flash setup.
lsisaxon said:If flash is a no-no, then a VR lens is the way to go. You might want to consider what espn has suggested, the 70-200/2.8 VR. The aperture of f/2.8 will give you more light so that you can use a shorter exposure time and the VR will additionally prevent camera shakes. However, this lens can set you back quite a bit.
No need to think so much, just go do it! :thumbsup:Koelsch said:i would actually consider 70-200/2.8 VR . the other DX 18-200 is like so way off my budget =( . oh well gotta learn from the start with the 18-55 first ;p
anyway what's 16FE?