miniUltraman
Senior Member
Is 7 million deep enough hold a 70-200F4 IS together with 400D body?
I think not quite fit but definitely can cover the flab... the 70-200f4 w/o the mounted body fits just nice IMO.
Is 7 million deep enough hold a 70-200F4 IS together with 400D body?
crumpler sucks! i sold my lowepro and bought a crumpler 5 mill. i think my lowepro was so much better. functional-wise but a bit ugly
Ok that's the deciding factor. I'm going with Whickey and Cox.
Any other bag that will be able to hold 70-200 with body? I hate changing everytime I need to use 70-200
Ok that's the deciding factor. I'm going with Whickey and Cox.
Any other bag that will be able to hold 70-200 with body? I hate changing everytime I need to use 70-200
Taking out everything from the bag... this is what I have...
![]()
Nice set of equipments=)
70-200 with body won't be able to fit it in nicely. The lens already at the bag limit=(
I'm buying the whickey and cox because I travel alot and carrying two bags to the plane can be a pain.
Any Lowepro sling bag can accomodate body + 70-200?
Take a look at this to have a rough gauge yourself... I have the 70-200 placed in one of the slots of the 7 mil dollar... (left top corner)
![]()
I've the same setup as u but without the 100mm macro. Both my Ls are put inside with the hood on and if including the lightsphere, my 7 mil home already full le.
Upz to you, broGood choice of gears. But I no longer own them except the 30D body, 580EX and the LS:cry: sold them all... Even the 7 mil home.. no more
![]()
Oh man....that gives u a gd reason to get new ones. ;p Even my bag colour's the same as yours!
... and we use the same brand dry cabi... heehee.. great minds think alike.. we must meet up someday :bsmilie: