Hi,
just a small suggestion which i have observed. Each moderator tends to use his/ her own style to moderate. As such, you get a 'A' response from Moderator A and 'B' from Moderator 'B'.
WHile i know that each one of us are different, perhaps there can be some consideration of consistency so that users are not confused.
I.e I see that Chngpe is quick to close threads without explainations (sometimes he doesnt explain much and people are shocked and having to accept his decision [his way or the highway], Ortega is nice to explain details, Kei implements infractions without having the explain and have you discovered his reasons (in a rude way), Clown sometimes is quick to close topic while other times friendly to explain why he does so, etc.
Without a common approach, people can be confused by the moderation. AT least i was when i first started. It deters people from coming to the website and makes it very 'Singaporean' (Dont question the authority style). (You would want to reduce miscommunication and encourage the right people to come right...?)
My small suggestion is to have a consistent way/ or simple rules of the thumbs that moderators can agree upon and not gg by each individual style.
Even large corporations train their GM in their corporate values so that no matter where they are deployed, the organization culture and values are kept consistent.
My two cents. Thanks for reading.
just a small suggestion which i have observed. Each moderator tends to use his/ her own style to moderate. As such, you get a 'A' response from Moderator A and 'B' from Moderator 'B'.
WHile i know that each one of us are different, perhaps there can be some consideration of consistency so that users are not confused.
I.e I see that Chngpe is quick to close threads without explainations (sometimes he doesnt explain much and people are shocked and having to accept his decision [his way or the highway], Ortega is nice to explain details, Kei implements infractions without having the explain and have you discovered his reasons (in a rude way), Clown sometimes is quick to close topic while other times friendly to explain why he does so, etc.
Without a common approach, people can be confused by the moderation. AT least i was when i first started. It deters people from coming to the website and makes it very 'Singaporean' (Dont question the authority style). (You would want to reduce miscommunication and encourage the right people to come right...?)
My small suggestion is to have a consistent way/ or simple rules of the thumbs that moderators can agree upon and not gg by each individual style.
Even large corporations train their GM in their corporate values so that no matter where they are deployed, the organization culture and values are kept consistent.
My two cents. Thanks for reading.