Jackals said:wats the purpose of the polarizers?
Its to prevent reflection on windows and bodies of water also gives nice skys. Can read more here.
Jackals said:wats the purpose of the polarizers?
txs brocerebrus said:Its to prevent reflection on windows and bodies of water also gives nice skys. Can read more here.
Jackals said:cerebrus, wat type/ brand of polarizer and filter would u recommend?
cerebrus said:Think it depends on how much $$ you haveI am using a normal Hoya UV 58mm. The slightly better one will be the Hoya HMC. There are a few other brands also. I am not an expert, still quite new to digital photography. Before this was happily shooting with a rangefinder, all it had was a skylight filter. Could not really afford to experiment with film, too expensive. NightZ88 is using a Hoya cir-polarizer. See his post above.
I emailed Lensmate, they only give the standard bulk discount that is on the website.felixcat8888 said:For those who are interested in getting adapters, why not visit www.lensmateonline.com to check out the metal (aluminium) S2 (silver) or S3 (Black) version. 52mm is USD$22.95 and 58mm is USD $24.95. Shipping also depends on the weight of the package. Min is USD $12.00.
So assuming that there are 2 adapters in the pack of 1 pc 52mm and 1 pc 58mm or vice versa, the cost of the adapters is USD$44.90 + USD $12.00 = USD $56.90.
There is a review of the various wide converters that lensmate also recommends to use with the adapters and Raynox is one of them.
Jackals said:wats the purpose of the polarizers?
Looking at the Lensmate site, the pictures seem almost to be similar. I think that you loose a bit of light using the Canon adapter though. I have seen some wonderful shots on DPreview with the 1540 and S2IS. Colours are fine, images are sharp. I will try out the lens once Morphis has the 52mm adapter.wishxtreme said:Cerebrus, understand that you are going to buy the raynox tele converter DCR-1540PRO - 1.54X.
CAn i know whether is this converter better than the orginal cannon TC-DC58B 1.5x Teleconverter? Dun mention on the zoom as i think 0.04 diff is minimal, but i need to know whether the image quality and the sharpness as well the color is similar or is there a great diff?
Thanks
John
swing123 said:hi,
sorry to hijack the thread here as i am getting a bit desparate.
I am going to get a pentax as second phone this evening. It came with free 512SD card. Over the phone, the guy quotes me S$25 if to upgrade the free card to 1GB and S$70 for 2GB card. Both are Kingston standard, not Elitepro.
Is the deal worth it or i should just keep the free card and purchase the 2GB separately? i would prefer not to keep so many card around if can but again, if the upgrade deal is not worth it then i suppose i can keep the free card.
Cheers,
Swing
OT!! OT!! :nono: Pentax on top of tt.... :sticktongswing123 said:hi,
sorry to hijack the thread here as i am getting a bit desparate.
I am going to get a pentax as second phone this evening. It came with free 512SD card. Over the phone, the guy quotes me S$25 if to upgrade the free card to 1GB and S$70 for 2GB card. Both are Kingston standard, not Elitepro.
Is the deal worth it or i should just keep the free card and purchase the 2GB separately? i would prefer not to keep so many card around if can but again, if the upgrade deal is not worth it then i suppose i can keep the free card.
Cheers,
Swing
swing123 said:pentax as second phone
cerebrus said:When did they make phones? :think:
Hehehe :bsmilie:
cerebrus said:OT!! OT!! :nono: Pentax on top of tt.... :sticktong
Make sure she does not read this forum!! :bsmilie:swing123 said:i am dreaming of one day, i can choose my second wife......:bsmilie:
Yeah, no full weather proof cam. Though lots of theirs come with UW casing. Wish the S2/S3 had one....swing123 said:i am getting second cam mah....the waterproof feature is really a plus for outdoor activities....only Pentax and Oly produce waterproof range....when is canon gonna do one??
The one advantage of some of the third party WC is that there is no loss of light. This way, you will get the same shutter speed & f# as if you were not using the adapter. Raynox is one that can do this, which is why some of us want to get it. Also, some of the thrid party WC let you screw on filters etc, which the Canon cannot do. I would recommend third party adapters. The Canon adapter is black plastic, seems very cheap. The third party adapters are from $45-60.tks said:Guys, I am kind of lost in this discussion.
I realise that a wide converter would be most useful. Just today, I was trying to take a picture of all the people in a meeting room sitting around a table and I just could not get all of them in the picture. I was backed up all the way to the corner of the room. So, I think a wide converter could have done the job?
I think I need the Canon adapter plus wide converter. The price at AP should be around $48 plus $165 if I am not mistaken. Are there any price or other advantages in buying third party products? Any suggestions? I notice that some of you mentioned filters etc. I suppose with the Canon accessories, filters etc may not be fitted?