Personally I see no Point with the 5DS and 5DSR.
In fact I think Canon is confused over their own product lines.
They claim that the 5DS and 5DSR is targeted at landscape photographers or perhaps studio work for people who requires extremely high resolution.
Well as many of you have pointed out, there's something called the Medium Format.
Then you might rebut me:
perhaps it is targeted at people who are studio/landscape photographers who want to utilize Canon's extensive line of lenses
With exception to a few of the "legendary" lenses, at 50.6MP, it is gonna out-resolve 99% of Canon lenses.
Moving on
Regardless how many megapixels you throw in, a Bayer Color Filter Array is a Bayer Color Filter Array is a Bayer Color Filter Array. The camera will not be able to capture really really fine detail as well when compared to a certain Medium Format which captures FULL COLOR INFORMATION, 100% of the scene. Not RBG guess work.
- Would a Landscape Photographer want the (reportedly) same Dynamic Range as 7D2
- Would a Studio Photographer who wants very very fine details want the normal Bayer Color Filter Array?
- Would a Studio Photographer who wants very very fine details want a camera back with the effect of the low pass filter cancelled out (not removed) vs competitors who took out the filer entirely?
And on why I feel Canon is confused over their own product lines.
There's nearly absolutely no justification for them to have 2 models of the same camera.
Since the 5DS and 5DSR is said to target landscape/studio photographers, just make one camera with the LPF (Low Pass Filter) effect cancelled out, why the need for a "5DS"?
and then we have the 750D vs 760D
hahahahaha
they are gonna self-cannibalize their own market while increasing their own supply chain cost for having multiple product lines.
if not for their beautiful ecosystem of lenses and the very well respected professional services
Canon would have long been in the reds