sure or not...![]()
sure.. decided that my lens should be 1x UWA zoom and 1x telezoom.. the in between ones.. I think the most applicable for me is primes.. 35mm, 50mm and 85mm![]()
Maybe when you see the result and the photo from 24-70mm II.... we will hear a different story.......
It happens..... :bsmilie:
Only in cases where you don't have time to change lenses, and you need something on the go, then the 24-70 is it.
avsquare said:yup.. same thoughts.. for me.. alternating between landscapes and portraits meant UWA and the 70-200 for me. The middle range.. I doesn't seem to touch it these days. Maybe when you only want one lens during travel, then I guess a 24-105 would be the best choice instead. ;p
ageha said:Yeah, 24-70mm is a bit limited for travel these days.
I think for travel, 24-105mm is a better option.
I think for travel, 24-105mm is a better option.
neubdetat said:One lens for travel?
No lah.
The best one lens solution is the 28-300L!
One lens for travel?
No lah.
The best one lens solution is the 28-300L!
Yes. 24-105mm in on my camera and in bag either a 17-40 or a 70-200. but I am thinking of just a prime 24L or 35L on camera and with just 70-200 in the bag. Have anyone tried that?
One lens for travel?
No lah.
The best one lens solution is the 28-300L!
link: Canon 24-70mm F2.8 L II USM arived - Canon Digital Photography Forums
user review on 24-70L II
"to be honest I like the 24-105 better, feel a lot more solid and more smoother when zooming, the new lens felt a bit too plasticky for my liking, definitely a tab heavier tho."link: Canon 24-70mm F2.8 L II USM arived - Canon Digital Photography Forums
user review on 24-70L II