I had frens after marrying or embarking into new career, gave up dlsr for compact becos they have new goals in life.
Very true. Gonna give up dSLR soon.
(Will return in 2 years time with a vengence. Muhaha, D3Xs with Trinities, here I come!) ;p
Wan to know this interesting question, how many of you can downgrade urself from dslr to compact camera?![]()
Yes, Of Course.
One day when I become very good in shooting, I will change to a compact, a film compact in fact. It's all with the photographer - as I have understand from the many advice given in various postings here. I am using an advanced DSLR now, because I am no good!
i will just say get the right equipment for the right handling and right effects. some do pinhole, some do lomo, some do rangefinder, some do DSLR, some do film SLR and some do medium to large formats, each different in handling and with some difference in the results. i would try equipments that gives me more ease and to better reach the effect i want. i dun think by limiting myself with an equipment that is less suitable for a certain kind of photography would help me in any way, nor does it prove much.
i think it would be good to define and analyse what is a digital compact good for. perhaps in terms of security-minded urban situations under sufficiently bright lighting, for desired wide depth of field, and desired longer focal length for more distant street subjects not requiring flash. would anyone like to add for strengths and applications of digital compact versus the others (e.g.DSLR, RF)?
I meant it as a pun to some of those weird logic that surfaced in this forum once in awhile as "advice'.
Yes, I concur with your argument and I am not a weird parrot.
i will just say get the right equipment for the right handling and right effects. some do pinhole, some do lomo, some do rangefinder, some do DSLR, some do film SLR and some do medium to large formats, each different in handling and with some difference in the results. i would try equipments that gives me more ease and to better reach the effect i want. i dun think by limiting myself with an equipment that is less suitable for a certain kind of photography would help me in any way, nor does it prove much.
i think it would be good to define and analyse what is a digital compact good for. perhaps in terms of security-minded urban situations under sufficiently bright lighting, for desired wide depth of field, and desired longer focal length for more distant street subjects not requiring flash. would anyone like to add for strengths and applications of digital compact versus the others (e.g.DSLR, RF)?