Beware of this Photographer, stylist & Editor

  • Thread starter Thread starter alpstan
  • Start date Start date

hmm
the camera??
but then... the camera is full of "spot"

Go to the camera's service ctr to get it clean up...

Feeling sorry for the TS and pe, I guess we just have to be more careful... Which reminds me of NBYN case...
 

Can make the clown photo larger? So easier to remember that face.

Img_376%20copy_edited.jpg

Him?
http://www.bizmediaresources.com.sg/page8.html
 

So he came to CS, threatening members with lawsuits, accusing his client as cheat and expecting pple to believe his sob stories. Not even attempting to explain the many specific questions thrown at him. How disgraceful and shameless can one get? :thumbsd:
 


Waaaa, heavily in debt still can wear nice watch and use bluetooth headset. Damn power.

I am no longer in any debt and I only wear lousy Casio.

I love how he say it in his own website: http://www.bizmediaresources.com.sg/page9.html
... clients will feel they are valued and you care after the business is transacted. Clients will return with more businesses or they become your referrals for new businesses.
 

Last edited:
Dude...

If you're $80,000 in debt, it doesn't mean we should pity you. You still have to do a good job.

And if you're $80,000 in debt, I would really think that you are out to cheat rather than to make something work out with your life.


I think after your replies, everything is out in the clear. There's nobody here who doesn't think you weren't out to con someone. Touch your bloody conscience, if you still have one.
 

I think TS should proceed to Small Claims Tribunal and make a case, not just for money's sake, but as a matter of principle.

Who in business don't suffer ups and downs? During the last economic recession in 97, I owed my printer $20K+ but I never ran away from them. I took all their calls, replied all their letters etc. Eventually, little by little, I paid them off. Economic downturn is no excuse for delivering shoddy services.
 

good, this Joseph is using home address as his registered business address. So can find him and get your money back if he owe u money :bsmilie:

not just that. i'm reading wad mr hong has kindly stated: 10 pairs of shoes.

yet somehow he managed to sign a contract thingy saying 43 shoes? i'm amused at his eyesight. PE, perhaps u shldnt had let him off. if u had nailed him down the first time, perhaps the second guy wont kenna it already:think:

and my advice to the second guy, bring it up to courts for settlement. as far as i can tell from his comments, he does not deny the fact that
1: he accepted the job, promised to shoot 43 pairs of shoes.
2: He does not deny the fact the photos were badly done and that he attributes it to *u may wish to ignore wads in the brackets cause its not impt* (bad business and in debt)

and 3: he received payment.


meaning he is responsible for delivering goods that are of quality, and since from the uploaded photos, it doesnt seem to be tally with the price paid, u shld be able to get some money back
 

Also, she never gave the pair of shoes to the model when this was agreed as part of payment arrangement for the use of the model's feet for the photo shoot. The original agreement was 10 pairs of shoes but she brought 49 pairs for the photo shoot, I accommodated her and yet she calls me a cheat. She is the cheat because I agreed to 10 pairs of shoes but I end up shooting 45 pairs of shoes without asking for additional payment of my time and work.

i'll wish to ask mr hong, is there any written statement of sorts for this matter? because while u may claim that its 10 shoes, plus a pair for the model, u have not substantiated ur claims with evidence, unlike TS, who uploaded a copy of the contract stating u have accepted the job offer for shooting 43 shoes. and upon looking, i see the fees as only $1500 without shoes

img removed.
 

Last edited:
I was trying to develop more business to salvage my situation but that was an uphill task bec I got stuck in the midst of a poor economic climate. So stop being a saint and judge me when you don't understand my situation. And, stop throwing at me comments till you are in the same boat and got off without a tinge of sin committed.

The client then did not pay me as well, I incurred more losses so what do you want me to do then? If you were in the same boat like I did then, I am sure you won't be so self righteous about the matter.

When you are down and out, flat at the bottom, financially broke from a huge lost in a business deal, I am sure you may behave in more blantant ways than what I have done.

rich or poor, a man without integrity is a man who does not deserve any respect.

no need to tell sob story to try to incur pity, you get none from me (and i suspect, anyone) and you are a sad case. so pitiful and pathetic. what do you think we are, 12?

if i had no money, i would rather work my ass off at mcdonald's than cheat people. no need to say "oh, my life sucks, you don't understand me i am so sad." that's just.. pathetic. i'm sorry, but i can't think of any other word for it.
 

Somehow, I don't feel that TS is the second guy and uncle PE is the first one :think:

as in this context bah. just wanna see something done. i totally dislike people who con and scam. past experience from my parents, who run a construction company. got conned/scammed/bad loan to another company. very big sum somemore. end up never recovered the amt, and it was quite tough in my younger years. life wasnt easy. yet now we are a decent middle class family doing pretty well. which is good:thumbsup:

but due to that fact, i have a strong dislike for expert conmen.
 

all i can say is that, joseph, you best keep this in mind.

when you play with fire, one day you will get burnt.

suggest you change yourself, change your attitude to life, the world is not your oyster and you can't always abuse people's kindness.

one day you might offend the wrong person, who has the energy and time to grind it out with you, and then $80k debt will be the least of your troubles. and that's still mild compared to what some violent and angry people might do.

i suspect that this advice will fall on deaf ears though.
 

one day you might offend the wrong person, who has the energy and time to grind it out with you, and then $80k debt will be the least of your troubles. and that's still mild compared to what some violent and angry people might do.

不是不报,只是时辰未到。。。Come to think of it, he is quite stupid to use his residential address for running a shady business. People can easily find their way to where he lives. What's worse is that he not being responsible to his family because what he is doing outside actually puts his innocent family members at risk. Not everyone will take the official route of going to small claims tribunals...
 

不是不报,只是时辰未到。。。Come to think of it, he is quite stupid to use his residential address for running a shady business. People can easily find their way to where he lives. What's worse is that he not being responsible to his family because what he is doing outside actually puts his innocent family members at risk. Not everyone will take the official route of going to small claims tribunals...

I am in the opinion that the amount involved is usually small, ranging from a few hundres (Uncle PE's case) to maybe 1 to 2K (TS' case). Going to court or go going to his home will be a hassel as the amount is not big. And people will just write it off as bad debt or bad luck ... so he got off scot free .. smart a*&
 

Back
Top