Then you might get the response "Argh, them again".. :bsmilie:
I shud have taken a pic of those LGs and sent them to the organisers!
I shud have taken a pic of those LGs and sent them to the organisers!
Navy open house?:bsmilie:
There is always a fine line even for official photographers. They should do their job with minimal distraction to the performers (or models in this case) and audience.
Think about this: Should taxi drivers always have the right of way? :dunno:
do they need the right of way? if they need i'll say give them. if they dun screw them. same as pgs. if they really need that photo or else can commit suicide, i say give them. if they are play play photographers i say heck them.
there is also the wonderful idea called be smart and stand somewhere else too for the viewers.:bsmilie:
there is also the wonderful idea called be smart and stand somewhere else too for the viewers.:bsmilie:
GPGT.
Here it is, from my iphone :bsmilie:
![]()
:think: Depends lah. Taxi drivers don't absolutely need to cut 2 lanes suddenly to pick up passengers but it adds up to their income. Very often there is no such thing as they really need that photo or else can commit suicide. They are always other jobs out there.
Maybe organizers need multiple level ladders for future events. Pgs can come early to chop the highly sought after level 1's to get their highly desirable eye level views and the rest can take level 2-10 to see the show better :bsmilie:
there is also the wonderful idea called be smart and stand somewhere else too for the viewers
I think purpose of such events are usually to showcase to the public and so viewers shud have the priority. Whenever i'm shooting events ( not for money though ) I try my best not to inconvenience anybody...even fellow photogs. I think you seem to have the idea that bcos you are shooting for money...you have every right to stand on your ladder and dun give a damn abt the consequences....tsk tsk tsk....that's really very inconsiderate and rude.
TS, is this what you see?
![]()
:think:
Please read the following with an open mind, written to stimulate discussion rather than to provoke. I do not necessarily support the viewpoint contained therein:
This thread to me is just a sad reflection on society in Singapore. I don't think it reflects well on the male population, and on photographers. What can a photographer possibly get out of an event like that?
Cluttered backgrounds, poor lighting, jostling for space, no space or freedom to move and compose?
Why do they all bother?
TS, is this what you see?
![]()
:think:
do they need the right of way? if they need i'll say give them. if they dun screw them. same as pgs. if they really need that photo or else can commit suicide, i say give them. if they are play play photographers i say heck them.
there is also the wonderful idea called be smart and stand somewhere else too for the viewers.:bsmilie:
TS, is this what you see?
![]()
:think:
Nice points raised there. I too wonder what satisfaction you'd get by taking pictures of events. I guess the official photographers have no choice, friends of the participants maybe would like to get some shots of their friends. What do the "extra" photographers do with the pictures? Link them on clubsnap?
Cluttered backgrounds, poor lighting, jostling for space, no space or freedom to move and compose?
Why do they all bother?