Another CPIB case


If evidence so graphic and described in Court, then it is bad news for the lady (her repute tarnished) and the defendant.

whats more demeaning/humiliating to a woman ? .... oral sex or just outright sex .... for money... ?

ANY wife that see those type of SMSs in her hubby's mobile phone from another woman ..... the hubby will be DEAD !! lolzzz
 

Last edited:
The prosecutor wants to charge corruption, but now the case become personal life style. What credibility the prosecutor, the guy n the woman in the court have?
 

Channel 5 TV news at 9.30pm on 2 Nov 2012. Maybe heard wrongly. Can the rest of you watch the news later and double check.

Did the defence lawyer really say this?

"...there was no sexual gratification because there was no satisfaction. "

So was the lawyer saying that no crime was committed because the lady's oral sex was not good enough?

A preposterous statement.
 

Channel 5 TV news at 9.30pm on 2 Nov 2012. Maybe heard wrongly. Can the rest of you watch the news later and double check.

Did the defence lawyer really say this?

"...there was no sexual gratification because there was no satisfaction. "

So was the lawyer saying that no crime was committed because the lady's oral sex was not good enough?

A preposterous statement.

Well.. he had to "DIY" :bsmilie:
 

Last edited:
Channel 5 TV news at 9.30pm on 2 Nov 2012. Maybe heard wrongly. Can the rest of you watch the news later and double check.

Did the defence lawyer really say this?

"...there was no sexual gratification because there was no satisfaction. "

So was the lawyer saying that no crime was committed because the lady's oral sex was not good enough?

A preposterous statement.

LOL ! :bsmilie: :bsmilie: :bsmilie: for real!?
wonderful technicality for defense?
 

A Lay for an A


LOL !! I remember a teacher once in school many many years ago that occasionally liked flashing her panties at the students from her desk ( when she was sitting ) in the classroom ! WTF !
 

Channel 5 TV news at 9.30pm on 2 Nov 2012. Maybe heard wrongly. Can the rest of you watch the news later and double check.

Did the defence lawyer really say this?

"...there was no sexual gratification because there was no satisfaction. "

So was the lawyer saying that no crime was committed because the lady's oral sex was not good enough?

A preposterous statement.

cause corruption case, is need to prove that there is some "gratification"... don't mind him lah. he is doing his job. what other defense could he offer?
 

LOL !! I remember a teacher once in school many many years ago that occasionally liked flashing her panties at the students from her desk ( when she was sitting ) in the classroom ! WTF !

You were in the front seat? :bsmilie:
 

You were in the front seat? :bsmilie:

And very attentive in the class too I suppose.... Under table........... :bsmilie:
 

Last edited:
LOL !! I remember a teacher once in school many many years ago that occasionally liked flashing her panties at the students from her desk ( when she was sitting ) in the classroom ! WTF !

Many many years ago, there were no air-con classrooms in Singapore.

During hot flushes, probably some female teachers just need to flash to cool down .... probably those teachers are posting in some forums about young male students in the past, flashing their parts in her classes :p:p:p
 

Many many years ago, there were no air-con classrooms in Singapore.

During hot flushes, probably some female teachers just need to flash to cool down .... probably those teachers are posting in some forums about young male students in the past, flashing their parts in her classes :p:p:p

I'm sure they regret not being the pioneer!
 

Back
Top