Originally posted by StreetShooter
A valid point indeed. The sticky bit is: which comes first, the chicken or the egg? Do you pay, and then get good service, or get good service, and then pay? If I make enquiries as a customer, and you're willing to give me good service without any guarantees that I will buy, I will be happy to buy from you, even though you charge a bit more than the next guy.
The problem here, of course, is that everyone will take advantage of this. They will try this and try that, ask this and ask that, make their decision, THEN go round comparing prices and buy from the guy who gives the lowest quote. The one who attended to all their queries gets nothing. Is this fair? How many have gone to John 3:16 and done exactly that, but not bought anything?
On the other hand, mylau has ALREADY paid for future service through his purchase of the 1D, and there is a good chance he will buy more stuff, given his track record, so of course the AP people let him try everything. But of course not every customer is in that position.
I'm personally quite "price-sensitive" myself, ie I DO shop around for the best price. I see nothing wrong with that. The salesman's job is to win me over with BOTH price AND service. If your attitude stinks, I won't give you the satisfaction of taking my money, even if yours is the lowest price. My fortunate experience with AP is that they have satisfied me on both counts - their prices are one of the best in town, and their service is pretty good, at least where I am concerned.