AF-S NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G FX thread

[vengels]

Without hood.

It looks larger than I tot on the DF..

 

[onoz123]

It looks larger than I tot on the DF..

Longer than average 50mm lens, but not larger.
It's pretty lightweight combo, even my wife said it's not heavy at all.

 

[vengels]

Longer than average 50mm lens, but not larger.
It's pretty lightweight combo, even my wife said it's not heavy at all.

Sigma is longer and heavier.. If only it is the size and weight of the Nikon..

 

[Blur Shadow]

Sigma is longer and heavier.. If only it is the size and weight of the Nikon..

If I am not mistaken, the Sigma you are referring to is a f/1.4... Not exactly the same.

 

[vengels]

If I am not mistaken, the Sigma you are referring to is a f/1.4... Not exactly the same.

I know..
Comparing the two cause same focal length..

Will go take a look at both lenses before deciding..

 

[WhiteFields]

Alamak. Why this thread die liao. Was wondering should I give in to this lightweight combo or stick to the sigma.

:think:

 

[Goldfishub]

Here's a photo at f1.8, ISO 400. Body used was Df. No post processing yet.

 

[Nehalem]

Hi guys, is getting a bnew 35/1.8G FX worth it when my DX 35/1.8G almost has the same output on FX?
Or is it even worth it getting as a 2nd-hand?

I'm referring to a comparison like the one below:
[video=youtube;PQKRwOgXUM0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQKRwOgXUM0[/video]

 

[mackie8]

how is this lens compare to the 28mm 1.8G?

 

[ortega]

Hi guys, is getting a bnew 35/1.8G FX worth it when my DX 35/1.8G almost has the same output on FX? Or is it even worth it getting as a 2nd-hand? I'm referring to a comparison like the one below: YouTube Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQKRwOgXUM0

the angle of view is different, but it is your call.