Blur Shadow
Senior Member
Just 1 more week to go to collect lens![]()
Wow! Envious!
Just 1 more week to go to collect lens![]()
Just 1 more week to go to collect lens![]()
dunno what you mean by nervous.
It is the green/magenta fringe which you see at out of focus area when there is a bright/dark transition.
It is VERY obvious and can be seen even on web sized pics....
Chromatic Aberration?
it is a specific kind of CA.
photozone calls it Bokeh Fringing / Longitudinal Chromatic Aberrations (LoCA)
http://www.photozone.de/nikon_ff/538-nikkorafd8514ff?start=1
Nice read
Didnt know about LoCA until I saw your link. But this is really not something that would bother a lot of ppl unless they are pixel peeping.
this was the reason i didnt get the AF-D version. i had the opportunity to test it from a very nice dude, and the very first shot i took, saw really really nasty LoCA, and also typical CA, which appeared at a point from white to black transition. (think a clothing price tag, resting on a black top)
hopefully the AF-S version doesnt have the same problem. If it doesnt, its gonna be on my "to buy" list.
this japanese guy compares both new and old 85 1.4 wide open.. draw your own conclusion
http://qshin.exblog.jp/13882523/#13882523_1
this japanese guy compares both new and old 85 1.4 wide open.. draw your own conclusion
http://qshin.exblog.jp/13882523/#13882523_1
hmm....for those who think CA is the main issue with the old lens, i think they'd be disappointed with the new one.
Based on the photo alone, the newer version seems to have slightly, only very slightly, better bokeh :dunno:
this japanese guy compares both new and old 85 1.4 wide open.. draw your own conclusion
http://qshin.exblog.jp/13882523/#13882523_1
That is the ultimate question.from what I can see, the saturation is increased (Nano coating , I believe as I have compared 16-35 and 17-35 and my 16-35 has more saturated color as well), and the corner is sharper.
But the centre is still similar. Worth the 1k more?![]()
That is the ultimate question.
Is the IQ improvement worth that 1K extra. Considering mine cost about 1.2K when I got it, paying twice the price for diminished returns is just being stupid.
this japanese guy compares both new and old 85 1.4 wide open.. draw your own conclusion
http://qshin.exblog.jp/13882523/#13882523_1
Looks like this is not only happened with AFD 85mm f/1.4, but also with other AFD lenses. I had owned AFD 85mm f/1.4 and sold it already. Previously I rented AFD 50mm f/1.4 and AFD 135 f/2 also suffered from LoCA, which appeared in the transition from bright to dark.
If you drop 1 f-stops down, LoCA will disappear. But no point right? Better purchasing the f/1.8 version, it's cheaper.
It's good that Nikon have updated their lens with AFS 50mm f/1.4G. Hopefully AFS 85mm f/1.4G also get improvement. For this reason, I don't do pre-order before knowing the quality of the new lens.
![]()
i had the 50 f/1.4 D before, but i didnt see that problem. probably i wasnt shooting it at areas with extreme black/white transitions. my first test with the 85 f/1.4 was shot wide open (otherwise, no point buying it, like you said), and the price tag of the clothes rack i was aiming at, gave me that horrid CA. just one shot and i was convinced not to get that. saved me quite a bit of $$ actually.
i am honestly hoping the newer version will fix that problem, or at least reduce it to a minimal. if it does completely fix the problem, i will pay that additional 1k on top of the 85 AF-D, to get it.
The bokeh is very smooth.
The bokeh is very smooth.