is the 24mm of 24-105 not good enough?
Currently same situation as TS. It's either a new 5DII or 7D for me. Do agree that the 7D issue is abit over hype, but it still left abit of a bad taste with me. Though I got 2 friends that own the 7D and have no issue with it.
Still adopting a wait and see attitude. If the 7D ghosting/AF issue is solved within say 3-4mths, I will get the 7D. The bells and whistles @ that price is worth it. Would love to get the 5DII, but I still feel it's over price currently.
And to TS, a crop body can shoot landscape as well with 10-22, jumping over to FF just for this single factor is not worth it. I believe 7D ISO performance is respectable as well. my personal opinion is, i dun make a living out of this (ocassional freelance not counted!), no point splurging so much, the money saved can be use for other meaningful stuffs.
Or we could just wait for 3D![]()
5Dmk2's IQ really blows u away..u feel like every shot is a damn good shot. :bsmilie:
ditch the 10-22 and get a 3rd party UWA... sigma's 15-30 is pretty good!
im thinking of Tamron 17-50, what's your comment on this?
hmm...that's a good question.. unfortunately i can't comment cause i haven't tried that combo yet.
but regardless of lens.. the body is great. going to get one myself sometime soon(i hope)
then we'll have to wait forever... haha! since after 3D came out, there will be problems and the next thing you might be saying is wait for 2D? 8D? :bsmilie:
That's true. The only advantages I can think of that the 7D has would be the digital level in the VF and its ability to use the EF-S 10-22.5d2 is probably a bigger step forward, u do not need the speed of the 7d for landscape anyway. And of course many will say the higher MP count is a boon for landscape shooting.
I do more landscapes and buildings as well and i am least bothered by the slower AF on the 5d2
ryan
Like the TS, I was contemplating upgrading my 40D to either a 7D or the 5Dmk2. It took a lot of soul searching as I really liked some of the features of the 7D including flash controller, having a flash, expansion of ISO to 12,800 (vs. 3,200 on the 40D). Given the price gap with the 5Dmk2, the 7D really seemed like a good buy, even though FF has its many advantages.
I was advised to go to the camera shop and take photos using both cameras and then go home to analyze. Besides the DOF control of the 5Dmk2, I thought that the IQ between the 7D and 5Dmk2 was close (but 5Dmk2 still wins). I then asked my wife to look at the photo comparisons without telling her which photos were taken by which camera. She was able to choose the 5Dmk2 in all circumstances. Note that she is a layman, but likes to be photographed; and all comparison photos were both with deep and shallow DOF, so it wasn't that she just liked the bokeh on the 5Dmk2.
Since my boss likes the 5Dmk2 images better, I went with the 5Dmk2... deep in my heart, I also knew that if I bought the 7D, I would be still hankering to upgrade to a FF in the future. I love photography, but I'm also a gearhead, so don't flame it for it.
I'm pleased with the 5Dmk2, but found 1 weakness - the auto focus, which seems to be worse than my 40D. Other than the centre AF, the outer AF points are quite slow. The AF points are also clustered in the middle of the photo. You can focus and recompose, but might shift DOF for shots with thin DOF.
To my eyes, yes, definitely. Guess it's the AA filter. I won't say 'soft' per se, just not 'edgy' sharp.Guys, I remember reading a thread here last month about 5D2 Image being too soft at 100% even with L lens compared to crop cam.
It was like a 2~3 pages of debates but can't find the thread anymore. Just Curious to know if it is true.
I seems that from ur responses, money is not of a problem to you and you have more or less tilt towards 5Dm2. Just get it and have fun!