kei1309 said:HOORAY! FINALLY! heh heh heh.
my bank account is screaming out to me~
DiGdUb said:more interested in d700 replacement.
D4-exceeding limits?
Good to wait for a month if you are not urge to get FX cam..Almost went to buy the D700 after this announcement, and then I saw this:
Nikon D800 in February? | Nikon Rumors
Been following the comments on the NR site, and a Feb release seems highly likely!
check out this photo: http://i.imgur.com/ZPpNA.jpg
They definitely look like D4 • D3x • D300s • D800 • D700
Guess I'll wait til Feb before I purchase![]()
I was waiting for D800, then looked at the supposed spec and saw 36MP, and now I am thinking seriously thinking about getting D700, new or used. 36MP is too much for me, won't need to MP for blowups, but would like to have the low noise capabilities of D700/D3/D3s, or D4, heaven forbids.
??? If the D800 is 36MP, ie enlarged version of D7000, it will have at least on par low light capability to D700 if not better.
This is maths.... since the D7000 and D700 sensor is well documented.
diediealsomustdive said:Thom Hogan said "the D7000 is not down to D3/D700 noise levels, let alone D3s noise levels. Nevertheless, it reaches unmatched levels for a crop sensor." You may not agree with Thom Hogan, but that is your math.
UncleFai said:This I absolutely agree. My old D90 cannot make it most of the time at ISO 1600. Now my D7000 usually gives me pretty decent pictures (esp. with PP de-noise) at ISO 1600. But the other day, I went head on with my friend and his D700 at ISO 1600. Sharpest - no fight, I use a cheap Tammy and him the 24-70mm f2.8. But even for noise, I had to surrender. His was very clearly cleaner.