450D or 1000D?

Which one?


Results are only viewable after voting.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Juz got my 450D ... Happy user now lol
 

I got a 1000D and my friend have a 450D. We bought it a few weeks different. 450D has better grip. and it is very useful for my friend as a guy. in terms of quality both are similar.
 

I got a 1000D and my friend have a 450D. We bought it a few weeks different. 450D has better grip. and it is very useful for my friend as a guy. in terms of quality both are similar.

I just tested the 1000D vs 450D at Canon showroom. Took some RAW photos and came home to analyze.

Both cameras produce very similar output at ISO 100 and 1600. The 1000D has far better pixel sharpness than the 40D due to its weaker AA filter. It also appears that the sensor in the 1000D is NOT the same as the one in the 400D. It does not exhibit that ugly blotchy and colored dots at high ISO. In fact, the 1000D high ISO capability is equal to that on the 40D. Very impressive stuff for a so-called entry level DSLR. :thumbsup:
 

I just tested the 1000D vs 450D at Canon showroom. Took some RAW photos and came home to analyze.

Both cameras produce very similar output at ISO 100 and 1600. The 1000D has far better pixel sharpness than the 40D due to its weaker AA filter. It also appears that the sensor in the 1000D is NOT the same as the one in the 400D. It does not exhibit that ugly blotchy and colored dots at high ISO. In fact, the 1000D high ISO capability is equal to that on the 40D. Very impressive stuff for a so-called entry level DSLR. :thumbsup:

where is this canon showroom where you mentioned? Can i test the camera over there?Thank You
 

you can go to vivo city...

thanks...went to tried eos450d and 1000d also...how you copy the photo back???u brought your laptop there?

I took some photo at high ISO also....playing around with the apeture ...on LCD the result looks good(dont really trust LCD)....overall the eos1000d feel better for me in my hand....

should i or should i not buy..oh no....:)
 

Bring your own SD card. :)

care to send me the pic sample??
Thanks...i can pm you my email:)

any know has pic taken with 1000d at 800 and 1600 ISO??(cant find online).
I am a sucker for high ISO..never like to use flash whenever possible...

Thank You
 

Last edited:
IMG_0946-1.jpg


IMG_0895.jpg


Sport Mode (AUTO). All pics taken at night in the hall, no flash, unedited, just resized.
ISO800, F1.8.

KISS_2612S.jpg


P Mode (Manual Focus, camera on arm support of my chair). Pic taken at night in the hall (even less light the pics above), no flash, unedited, just resized.
ISO1600, F1.8, 1/10.

KISS_2612SS.jpg


Same pic, but adjusted the contrast and brightness
 

Last edited:
RIMG0546.jpg


Same senerio, taken with my Ricoh GX100, camera on arm support of my chair.
P mode, ISO1600, F2.5, 1/13, unedited, just resized.

RIMG0547.jpg


Same senerio, taken with my Ricoh GX100, camera on arm support of my chair.
P mode, ISO80, F2.5, 1S, unedited, just resized.

Just to show how dark it is, for knowledge sharing. No need to be critical.
 

Last edited:
Thanks. ISO 1600 appears to be noisy but with correct exposure the noise seems acceptable.
 

any know has pic taken with 1000d at 800 and 1600 ISO??(cant find online).
I am a sucker for high ISO..never like to use flash whenever possible...

You can download jpeg and RAW images here, all taken under controlled lighting conditions for easy comparison. They are pretty incredible.
 

Both photos taken in room light. No PP done. Both same white A4 backgroud

IMG_1726.jpg


IMG_1731.jpg
 

Last edited:
Both photos taken in room light. No PP done. Both same white A4 backgroud...

Both images exhibit slight softness. and it looks like it was due to camera shake. You wouldn't be using a tripod, would you?

EDIT: Actually the second image looks to be softness due to diffraction. First image looks like a case of indistinguishable focus area.
 

Last edited:
Both images exhibit slight softness. and it looks like it was due to camera shake. You wouldn't be using a tripod, would you?

EDIT: Actually the second image looks to be softness due to diffraction. First image looks like a case of indistinguishable focus area.

I used the tripod for both.
I looked again and maybe there is some problem with focusing?:think:
 

I used the tripod for both.
I looked again and maybe there is some problem with focusing?:think:

Hmm yeah...at least the first one. Focus seems to lie somewhere along the lens barrel, from the looks of it.

Second one looks like diffraction to me.
 

just wanna check are canon lens(compare apple to apple). more expensive than other brand like Nikon ,Pentax,Sony?

thanks
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top