24-70mm f2.8 vs 17-55mm f2.8


Haha the reason why I chose this two lenses is because of the f2.8
agreed, if got money i will go for f2.8 lens

if u know u going to upgrade to full frame next time, 24-70 is better choice.
 

GReddyZC76 said:
Theres a few wts there... Maybe u can consider ...... Was also checking out new grey set pricing and comparing..... since most wts are out of warranty......

Ya I checked. Viewing later and tar :P Gray set like 300 dollar more exp leh.
 

diglomex said:
agreed, if got money i will go for f2.8 lens

if u know u going to upgrade to full frame next time, 24-70 is better choice.

Yeah I like the 24-70mm more also. But not as wide. So maybe for the wide end I'll use my kit lens ^^ I doubt UWA converters work right!
 

Fudgecakes said:
Yeah I like the 24-70mm more also. But not as wide. So maybe for the wide end I'll use my kit lens ^^ I doubt UWA converters work right!

Dun stick those UWA converter on ur 24-70mm pls. Use a proper UWA if u need that kind of wide.
 

Cowseye said:
Dun stick those UWA converter on ur 24-70mm pls. Use a proper UWA if u need that kind of wide.

Nono I mean if I stick it on my kit lens. Omg waste of money big time if I stick in on 24-70
 

Nice, buy together then better price.. any idea what the price for this lens
 

small pig said:
Nice, buy together then better price.. any idea what the price for this lens

Which lens?
 

small pig said:

In sg abt 2.4-2.7k. Grey set abt 2.3k. Used abt 2.1k. I've done my homework :D in m'sia their equote abt the same but can bargain till abt 2.1k for new set I think
 

Fudgecakes said:
In sg abt 2.4-2.7k. Grey set abt 2.3k. Used abt 2.1k. I've done my homework :D in m'sia their equote abt the same but can bargain till abt 2.1k for new set I think

I checked several places abt 2.5k...

I had compiled a list, u want I can email u...

Pm me ur email...

:)
 

GReddyZC76 said:
I checked several places abt 2.5k...

I had compiled a list, u want I can email u...

Pm me ur email...

:)

Ya I have a list also :P send to small pig uh :D
 

Hi,

by mounting a 17-55 DX lens on FF body, does that the theroticate focal length will be about 24~88mm?
Whatever angle I see through the viewfinder of FF body via DX lens, will be the same as the image taken?
 

Hi,

by mounting a 17-55 DX lens on FF body, does that the theroticate focal length will be about 24~88mm?
Whatever angle I see through the viewfinder of FF body via DX lens, will be the same as the image taken?

no. Focal length is absolute. it will give you a focal length of 17-55 whether mounted to DX or FX body. On a DX body, it will give you FOV of 25.5mm - 82.5mm. FX body it will give you FOV of 1mm to 55mm with lots of vignetting.
 

OIC. on other words. if there is plan for FX body in future, 17-55 will be 'useless'.

Then how about FOV of 24-70mm if used on DX body?

no. Focal length is absolute. it will give you a focal length of 17-55 whether mounted to DX or FX body. On a DX body, it will give you FOV of 25.5mm - 82.5mm. FX body it will give you FOV of 1mm to 55mm with lots of vignetting.
 

Last edited:
OIC. on other words. if there is plan for FX body in future, 17-55 will be 'useless'.

Then how about FOV of 24-70mm if used on DX body?

well. i wouldn't say useless. You can always sell it. 17-55 is the best standard fast zoom for DX cameras. If you use the 24-70 on a DX body, it becomes 36mm-105mm... you lose the wide end.
 

daredevil123 said:
well. i wouldn't say useless. You can always sell it. 17-55 is the best standard fast zoom for DX cameras. If you use the 24-70 on a DX body, it becomes 36mm-105mm... you lose the wide end.

But 2.2k for a crop sensor lens abit hard to swallow uh
 

But 2.2k for a crop sensor lens abit hard to swallow uh

Then get the Sigma 17-50 OS. If still think it is too ex, get the tamron 17-50 non VC.

If you want the best, you have to pay.
 

Back
Top