My first L lens is the EF 24-105 f4 and then the EF 70-200 f2.8 IS. I am now aiming to buy the EF 16-35 f2.8 for wide angle shots![]()
My first L lens is the EF 24-105 f4 and then the EF 70-200 f2.8 IS. I am now aiming to buy the EF 16-35 f2.8 for wide angle shots
EF 24-105 f/4L IS USM | EF 50 f/1.4 USM | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM
You have all the lenses that i want...![]()
Why not a 10-22? Less overlap, and you go wider too. Don't get L just for the sake of getting L.
Just want to get some guidance from fellow forummers here. I saw some post an advert that they have personally tested a few sets of the L lens before deciding on on sharpest set of L lens to choose from. Is there substantial variance in performance from one L lens to another ? Another way, is there substantial manufacturing variation in these L lens ?
Besides, I am assuming they are viewing the shots from the camera itself. Is it possible to even do test like this using the limited screen on the camera?
I don't have an "L" lens yet. But I have a "L" phone though...