I was referring to the H9.

IMO, the battery life seems kinda bad for a semi-pro DSLR. Even lower than A200.
No LiveViwer, which might be useful for low angle shots.
Pricewise still on the high side, especially for Singapore.
Lack of Lens selection.
IMO, the battery life seems kinda bad for a semi-pro DSLR. Even lower than A200.
No LiveViwer, which might be useful for low angle shots.
Pricewise still on the high side, especially for Singapore.
Lack of Lens selection.
IMO, the battery life seems kinda bad for a semi-pro DSLR. Even lower than A200.
No LiveViwer, which might be useful for low angle shots.
Pricewise still on the high side, especially for Singapore.
Lack of Lens selection.
IMO, the battery life seems kinda bad for a semi-pro DSLR. Even lower than A200.
No LiveViwer, which might be useful for low angle shots.
Pricewise still on the high side, especially for Singapore.
Lack of Lens selection.
Hi Boombox, thx for sharing your experience on the A700.
I'm not opposing Sony, I almost bought the A700 when I was at HK.
But was dissapointed when read on Paper that the CIPA battery test for the A700 was only 650 shots.
Didn't know it would fire 3000 shots on a single battery.
I'll wait for A900 to see what it delivers!
a700 battery life test ......
http://alphatracks.com/archives/88
3000 shots with LCD review, how many more do you want ?![]()
Hi Boombox, thx for sharing your experience on the A700.
I'm not opposing Sony, I almost bought the A700 when I was at HK.
But was dissapointed when read on Paper that the CIPA battery test for the A700 was only 650 shots.
Didn't know it would fire 3000 shots on a single battery.
I'll wait for A900 to see what it delivers!