Quite an amazingly long thread with some heated points being made. Reality is that if there is a supply, then there is a demand. I have nothing against hobbyist shooting events...
only when they start making a nuisance of themselves to the general public.
Also, why impose moral values to others? It's natural male instinct to have a affinity for the female human forms. ANd what of the female photographers (few, though they may be) doing these events.... If this was anywhere else, the stereotype of a "dirty old man" photographer would probably not get this much attention. Case in point, the recent TV advert even had a typical "dirty old man" shooting in a studio. This versus the "dirty old man" photographer, Austin Powers, who is done with good humour. So why do we laugh at virile Austin Powers but associate that local advert with the typical dirty old man.:bsmilie:
Could it be years of being in straight laced Singapore, has in fact cultivated a sort of anti-freedom of expression whereby everything someone does is viewed with a "moral filter". If so, whose "moral filter" are we using. Short of understanding the typical event photographer, we would be in the danger of stereotyping this kind of photography. The general public might get the idea that anyone with heavy gear, a geeky look and not making money out of photography would be shooting with a negative moral value and be socially inept... ever wonder why street photography is hard to do in Spore but not in Japan or Hong Kong??
I like to photograph birds in the wild. Typically, I lug around several long lens, with a tripod, safari hat, sunglasses, insect repellent, Goretex boots, etc, etc... a lot of expensive gear too. Heck, some even buy SUVs or 4x4 to go over rough terrain in the jungle to shoot birds. I too, shoot with a passion without the idea of making money, to me its a hobby. I can shoot a Storkbilled Kingfisher over and over again and not get tired. The challenge to get consistently good shots is known to me as well as fellow birders. However, we do not get this kind of post about birders because, majority deem shooting birds to be morally neutral. However, for event hobbyist photographers, must we label them as this thread did? ;p
Another case in point, I was at Spore Botanic Gardens composing a shot for an elusive bittern (a kind of bird). Singaporeans would walk pass and produce a "Tsk tsk" sound and give me the, "why bother" look. Then there was this British couple who stopped in their tracks and spoke in whispers, afraid that the mere noise they made would break my concentration. They made comments like "... such dedication... ....look at the concentration...". So I stopped and chatted with them and they asked me what was I shooting. I kinda ended up talking about some of the great bird species they can find in the Singapore Botanic Gradens. Eventually, I got my shot and went home a happy man.
I had a chance to speak to some of these event hobbyist folks. I would say that some of them are quite dedicated to their craft, married with family and do take good shots. Even knew of one who used medium format to do this kind of shoots. Of course, some are driven by the male hormone in them, but I would not be so quick as to pass my judgement on all of them.:dunno: