I wonder why he didn't mention this - weight perhaps?
For me, it would be the GH2 and 100-300mm. No mirror slap also![]()
I think it's because he only had these 2 sets to borrow - no choice in the lenses.
I wonder why he didn't mention this - weight perhaps?
For me, it would be the GH2 and 100-300mm. No mirror slap also![]()
He's not buying that exact combo I think, just trying to compare apples and oranges.
But given a choice, I'd take an A55 with a 70-300G. No mirror slap.![]()
Anyway the comparison was done with the ultimate aim of choosing one system over the other. However, it wasn't the most thorough and fair comparison, so the results are pretty inconclusive.
In the end, I still think that the biggest deciding factors between these 2 cameras are gonna be things like ergonomics, price, features, weight, etc, instead of solely sharpness.
I wonder why he didn't mention this - weight perhaps?
For me, it would be the GH2 and 100-300mm. No mirror slap also![]()
@Rashkae
Thankyou in the first place, I like the way you put it "Compare apple w Orange":bsmilie:
But you have given me some indication: A55 + 70-300Ghttp://www.sony.com.sg/product/sal70300g
Total weight : 1201g vs D90 1365g
Now I have to find out how sharp is these two lenses are NIKOR 70-300 VR ED vs SONY 70-300G.
If SONY is sharper then I go for it even at maximum focal length=300 and I have another choice of buying the Sony MRL at 500mm.
Appreciate very much if any of our club members /Senior uses 70-300G before, please help with thanks.
Anyway the comparison was done with the ultimate aim of choosing one system over the other. However, it wasn't the most thorough and fair comparison, so the results are pretty inconclusive.
In the end, I still think that the biggest deciding factors between these 2 cameras are gonna be things like ergonomics, price, features, weight, etc, instead of solely sharpness.
you are unlikely to find many CSers who own both, thus being able to give you an objective opinion. A Nikon 70-300 user will likely vote for the Nikon lens, as would a Sony user vote for the Sony...@ZerocoolAstra
Thanks so much for following up my query, in-term of ergonomics I think both Nikon and Sony have a good interface with human so isn't the issue.
Price, both are also there as not much of a diff.
Features wise, just the matter of getting use to it and finally the weight is a big consent to me.
Sharpness is still the point, as Rashkae and your goodself has pointed out that "no mirror slap", I have not fully understand this terms but I think you are talking about the mirror movement.
So now more or less I have decided to go for A55+70-300G once I can have some feedback on these two lenses (Nikon 70-300VR ED vs Sony 70-300G) I'm done.
Thanks again
@elgkh
Thanks so much for follow up my query, YES! I did mention weight otherwise will be Canon + Big gunner lenes. I am a weak person and that is the reason I go for light weight but able me to capture reasonable sharp images of birds etc.
Thanks again.
Visited yr album, you have got NICE :thumbsup::thumbsup:shots.
you are unlikely to find many CSers who own both, thus being able to give you an objective opinion. A Nikon 70-300 user will likely vote for the Nikon lens, as would a Sony user vote for the Sony...
For such scientific tests on sharpness, best to rely on comparison sites like photozone.de and so on.
So now more or less I have decided to go for A55+70-300G once I can have some feedback on these two lenses (Nikon 70-300VR ED vs Sony 70-300G) I'm done.
Thanks again
See the links I posted.
The photos were shot at high ISO. Noise processing would affect the sharpness. If TS is going to shoot only at high ISO, then this comparison 'may' be useful. One would need to do another comparison at lower ISO to decide which one is better with less noise processing.
The photos were shot at high ISO. Noise processing would affect the sharpness. If TS is going to shoot only at high ISO, then this comparison 'may' be useful. One would need to do another comparison at lower ISO to decide which one is better with less noise processing.
Same advice as before. Test the A55 with the 70-300G for a "fair" comparison. Look at 100% crops, not reduced size images.
But just based on those 2, I still think the A55 looks sharper and I can see more texture, like in the cement area to the right of the crane, even though the 500mm mirror lens is not a very sharp lens and usually has poorer contrast. For the lower pic, it looks like in-camera sharpening was turned up higher instead of being at "0".
so in summary, you're still pursuing this "I'll buy the camera which is sharper" agenda?@Rashkae,
Sure Thanks will take your advise, I will go Sonystyle to do a test shot with A55+ 70-300G
Thanks again
so in summary, you're still pursuing this "I'll buy the camera which is sharper" agenda?
Don't any of the other factors affect your buying decision at all?