I'm planning to upgrade my camera from 400d to the 30d/40d but would like some opinions as I'm undecided to switch to either one. These are the issues, having money as the main concern (I'm on tight budget) :
1) 30d seem more affordable than 40d but the latter's price has begun to drop a little. Is it worth saving up a little more for the 40d's newer processor than 30d?
2) Some has said that it's not really much difference between 30d and 40d, in that we definitely can "live with it", as in nothing big in comparison. How true is that?
I know the obvious answer will be the 40d but is it really worth it saving that little amount (prob $400-$500) getting 30d and compromising on the later processing technology of 40d? Please advise.
1) 30d seem more affordable than 40d but the latter's price has begun to drop a little. Is it worth saving up a little more for the 40d's newer processor than 30d?
2) Some has said that it's not really much difference between 30d and 40d, in that we definitely can "live with it", as in nothing big in comparison. How true is that?
I know the obvious answer will be the 40d but is it really worth it saving that little amount (prob $400-$500) getting 30d and compromising on the later processing technology of 40d? Please advise.