Goliath1978
New Member
Wanna take a bet?
:bsmilie:
Huh? Then I also need to buy a dry box for a compact digital camera?
Wanna take a bet?
:bsmilie:
Actually every camera needs maintenance. Even a compact camera has similar components with a DSLR.. glass (lens), image sensor, etc.
Fungus grow on any available medium + supportive environment.. It doesn't differentiate types, be it compact or DSLR.
Well unless nowadays got so-atas type of fungus, don't wanna infect compacts, only choose DSLRs![]()
Goliath1978 said:Haiz... So if I calculate correctly, it is still worthwhile to buy an entry-level DSLR compared to a compact digital one since the price difference is almost not that great anymore. And I still need, at least, a dry box to keep it.
Getting the most out of the money does not necessarily mean getting the highest possible type of camera for that money. Get what you need and what you are comfortable with, get the accessories you need - and save the rest. Sure you can get a DSLR, with 2nd hand options you can get fairly good ones. But think about weight, size, learning curve for you in operating the cam (we have many threads here where people are disappointed about the results from DSLR - because they have wrong expectations), post processing and others.Haiz... So if I calculate correctly, it is still worthwhile to buy an entry-level DSLR compared to a compact digital one since the price difference is almost not that great anymore.
HI crysmeth, I'm looking to buy my first DSLR as well.
It'll be either a Canon 50D or a Nikon D5000. (I don't wanna spend too much on something that I'm just trying to pick up)
Why do you recommend a 50mm lens instead of a kit lens though?
Large aperture. 50 mm comes with either f/1.8 or f/1.4.
HI crysmeth, I'm looking to buy my first DSLR as well.
It'll be either a Canon 50D or a Nikon D5000. (I don't wanna spend too much on something that I'm just trying to pick up)
Why do you recommend a 50mm lens instead of a kit lens though?
crysmeth said:I would recommend the 50mm f1.8 for various reasons.
1. Cheap lens
2. Can be used on both crop and full frame (ff).
3. Has excellent IQ as compared with the kit 18-55. I have not used the other 18-135 but never in favour of such drastic differences.
4. DOF is really shallow. (i.e. a much blurrer background, ensuing your subject pops out)
5. At f1.8, it's a fast lens (Shutter can be set faster as Aperture can be set wider) hence with low light, you can still get good photos.
6. It's lightweight. Yes, the 18-55 is no stone too, but the 50mm is awesomely light.
7. It makes you learn more about composition. Many newbies (me included) relies on zoom to compose. With a fix prime lens, you learn to compose the 'hard way'. Walking.
Many newbies don't like the 50mm because it looks small and puny. Small and puny lens doesn't boost the ego. They need larger lens, with bigger wider glass to make them look pro. I use to be like that too. Somethings don't change... I'm still a newbie... but I now know that it's not the gear, but the experience.
that's why I always advocate. Buy 2nd hand body, and shoot with a new (or second hand) 50mm f1.8. Your investment would not be more than 700. Then shoot until you feel that you wan to explore more. More genres... landscapes... then perhaps invest in the 10-22 or tokina 11-16 (awesome lens), or 12-24. OR if you feel that shooting kids is getting slower on your 50D as the fps is only that many, then explore the 7D. or street is what you want to do, then the 50mm is good enough as you might not need the shallow DOF, hence you shoot at f11. Or portraiture is something you want to explore and 85mm is what you prefer.
All these will come with knowing what you want to shoot... but knowing what to shoot means you must shoot first....
Hope I not too long winded.