My take is that if I need to ask, that means I can't tell the diff straight out from the sample photos available on the web. In other words they make no diff to me.![]()
Beautiful lenses. All technicalities aside. Hold one in your hand. You will feel the urge to own them. It is just like holding a petite, nubile young girl's hands. The warmth and the kind of assurance that it transmit onto your palm, brings a feeling of possession and domination. As you hold it up against the light to marvel at its beauty, much the same you would gaze at a young girl's face for her flawless and smooth complexion. There is nothing but a sense of admiration and love. As you move to insert the lens into your body, it is like running your finger around a young girl's lips. You can feel the excitement and breath. As you sqeeze the shutter, the squeak of the girl is so refreshing. The image is so rich and intense. Every shot is so delightful and unforgettable that you crave for more. It is an addiction, a desire of not wanting to be left behind.
Jack would know how precious these little things are. It is hard to resists![]()
Their equipment feels, looks and reminds me more of sophisticated, cool, calculated and aloof, highly-polished, post-industralism cold steel and glass, hard-body sleek andro iron pumping butch rather than a petite, soft little girl. :bsmilie:
No offense; and in some circles, that's very high praise.
Yes, on screen, at 72dpi, you can't really tell the differences especially if it has been resized. But we don't just shoot for posting 500pixels on web, right? Part of the enjoyment in photography goes into appreciating prints, or high resolution images on screen.
ok. I am trying to soften its image abit. Whichever way one look at it - hard or soft. These are very attractive lenses. There will always be people who use the price vs performance ratio to put it down. And others who crons about its colour realism, intensity and contrasts. The best is get hold of one and feel it for yourself. I did and is only limited by what little my money can buy![]()
There are many samples that can be blown up to original size as well.
I guess I'm just not one of those ppl who have the 'gift' for poring over details :dunno:
Someone selling the Sumicron R APO 90f2 for 3.5k. Heard this lens beats them all.
It is just like holding a petite, nubile young girl's hands.
check out the MTF and the infrared photos in the below url as referred to in the B&S ad.
http://diglloyd.com/articles/MiscReviews/EOS1DM3MeetsLeicaAPOSummicronR.html
And this is the seller's extra set! OMG!
p/s: put a hold on your Zeiss 25 purchase. I heard a rumour. Zeiss might be making an improvement on this lens.
Leica lenses had been "touched" by "masters" during manufacturing whereas mass produced lenses are only handled by robotic arms and low skilled workers.![]()
i'm going to find a pair of young girl's hands and try to hold them before mounting them onto my lens.
brb to let you know if the image turns out sharp![]()
LOL! Was that a very subtle pun, if one were to imagine a close-up portrait taken with one of the late-version APOs?
i'm going to find a pair of young girl's hands and try to hold them before mounting them onto my lens.
brb to let you know if the image turns out sharp![]()
Yes I know, the ZE 25 was held back and is now due to release soon, hopefully by mid-year. My new ZE 35f2 is really super. The close focus allows excellent perspective. The Leica R APO 90f2 is a must have....maybe, next one after the ZE 25.