wrx_sti_22b
Senior Member
If you own a BMW M5, you have deep pocket... 5.0i V10 500bhp... the V10 engine burns a lot of petrol. But these cars like BMW M5, AMG MB E63 or C63, they depreciate a lot... used ones very hard to sell off.
OK, difference in opinion. Maybe in AU BMW 3 & 5 are mid range. However, in Singapore they cost from S$130K-330k (318i to M3) & $170k-450k (520 & M5)...definitely premium. An average BMW 520 costs double that of a Toyota Camry.
If Audi is luxury european, how can BMW be mid range when a BMW here costs more than Audi, new or preowned? Maybe different market, different positioning.
Does this also mean the E-Class is mid-range since BMW 5 is mid-range?
define Mid-range Japanese, chim man, prelude under mid-range Jap? So Subaru Legacy GT under Boy racer or wat huh? hehe
i thought owning a BMW/merc is considered a luxury vehicle..until i came to the UK and found out that more than half of the cars i see on the streets are BMWs/Mercs, and i see a M3/CLK/SLK every other day...:bsmilie:
Volvo under what category? :dunno:
Chevrolet Cruze.
So is that considered American or Korean?
Which category does the Nissan GT-R come under? Japanese Boy Racer?:devil:
The normal Subaru Legacy GT can be made to be like the Legacy STi in Japan. using a lot of the parts from STi or from the WRX STi. Can be pep to around 300bhp-320bhp wif no prob. Is tat a boy racer?
:nono: Supercar. The average boy racer cannot afford a GT-R. :sweatsm:
Yes it is still a wagon... just like the EVO Wagon even if there is a B22 engine inside.![]()
i would consider an A-class budget range, E-class mid range and S-class luxury range..\
Does this also mean the E-Class is mid-range since BMW 5 is mid-range?
i've even seen Jag taxis in the small town i'm at :bsmilie:They have MB S Class taxis. If you are talking abt London, yes, on the street a lot of expensive cars. AMG MB, RUF Porsche, Rolls Royce etc. The ppl in London are rich.
emo. i still underaged. so no cars. but when i grow up i wanna buy old old car. and take out the insides put new new stuff.
gonna get the chevy impala 1967. fitted wiht the latests technology. note i have no idea abt car tech. i just like the chevy look lol
That's an interesting choice.
Start with replacing the steering and the brakes because it's as cooperative as a stubborn animal.
That's being way too kind about the Impala, even with brakes that sort of work and steering that allows the vehicle to more or less wobble around a corner there's nothing you can do about the weight overhang at each end that end ups with a whole new meaning for body roll.
Hmm but that comment also applies to the vast majority of other US developed vehicles over the last 60 or so years in the automotive graveyard that is the USA. Even the US
A's only legitimate supercar (the Fraud oops sorry, Ford F40) was mostly designed and tweeked in the UK and Germany.
Dr Ian's best fix method for any Chevie or US built/developed vehicle is around 2 litres of gas,(petrol) and a match... :devil:
I'm not sure the U.S.A. ever needed its own supercar but the Dodge Viper was quite good at travelling long distances with a unique style for a touring car with the reflexes of a rough-and-ready sports car.
I haven't had a U.S. car since 1985--I'm on my fourth VW--but the level of U.S. vehicles is quite good these days, with the exception of anything from GM--Chevy/Chevrolet, Pontiac, Cadillac, Buick, or GMC. I don't understand how the Toyota Corolla and Matrix can be built in the same factory with their GM equivalents and be so much better and GM does nothing to improve.
However, 1960s GM vehicles were as good as most any other vehicle sold in the country. Italian and English (and sometimes, expensive German) vehicles were stopped on the side of the road by faulty electrics. Japanese vehicles weren't well made. It was a dismal time. If there were any bright spots, they would be Saab and Volvo.
...
Back in the 60s there were some legendary european vehicles that hit the road, the infamous Aston Martins (DB5, DB6, DB7) the E-Type Jag, AC Cobra as well as the seriously fast offerings from the likes of Ferrari, Porsche with the 911 and so on. Hardly an automotive dark age methinks. In the meantime the Americans kept on with muscle cars (which really weren't much muscle at all, braked and cornered woefully, and spent as much time blown up as running).
...
Usually if GM is co-producing a model it will be downgraded somewhat in terms of quality as GM have always been a lowest price producer, second only to Ford USA which as most people know is an acronym for "Found On Rubbish Dump" while GM stands for Godawful Monstrosity :devil:
Never heard that FORD. "Found on Road Dead" was quite frequently used here. Since their Ford Explorer was so prone to rollover, I thought that they should change to FORuD--"Found on Road Upside Down". I prefer "Generic Motors" for GM.
Ferrari, Lamborghini, Maserati--sidelined by Magneti Marelli electrics and Jaguar sidelined by Lucas electrics. I'm sure they were fun when they were working, though. :bsmilie: