I can imagine that there were individual posts in these threads that may have been in violation but to delete the entire threads? If that was the basis on which these entire threads were deleted then 1/2 the threads in CS would need to be deleted.
It seems that the slope down which CS is headed is getting steeper by the day. I think it may be time to change the logo to something like "alienate long time contributers at all costs".
As a curious bystander, can you explain why, if both threads were in violation of CS terms of use, one thread was allowed to run for several days, however, once the other thread appeared, it was pulled within 1 hour ?
Thanks Jason. Rather do business, link up business opportunities for clubsnap rather than engaging in any flame wars.
But I do think its necessary to clarify on the posting of Drumma's original pictures in a Open forum in Clubsnap. Do we want to encourage young photographers to shoot such pictures and package it as Art? Post it here and use Drumma's precedent to justify its legitimacy?
Just food for thought.
Thanks for your special kind attention on this.
Cheers,
Tuck
Here are the pictures again that sparked this 2 year flame war.
Should CS allows budding photographers to post such pictures as art and send out a wrong message to all young photographers that its ok to shoot such pictures as art. Long time contributors are supporting his action.
Here are the pictures again that sparked this 2 year flame war.
Should CS allows budding photographers to post such pictures as art and send out a wrong message to all young photographers that its ok to shoot such pictures as art. Long time contributors are supporting his action.
If you find these images so distasteful, why do you continue to post them? That is twice this morning!
Tuck,
I wonder why u ask "Should CS allows budding photographers to post such pictures as art and send out a wrong message to all young photographers"?
Shd or shd not seriously, it's doesn't matter, cos there's is nothing to debate abt...
I believe we have made our stand very clear, pictures like these will be deleted. I cant possilbly define the exact lines on what allowed and disallowed since no one can ever come up with a clear definition. But we do work on case by case basis on these issues.
Thanks for your quick statement on this matter. Would really appreciate if you can remove the equally flaming components in http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=224080
Since any google search will lead to a lot of misinformation and drawbacks for me.
Sorry for all the troubles created.
Tuck, we have already removed the offending pictures and I consider this case is closed.
I can't possibly go back to every backdated post and work on it. I believe I have made my stand very clear in my previous post.
Tuck, we have already removed the offending pictures and I consider this case is closed.
I can't possibly go back to every backdated post and work on it. I believe I have made my stand very clear in my previous post.
In fact, if you have not digged out that thread for reference, many people won't have remember or know about this. And people dont usually google search for a specific case like this unless they have some good or bad intents in the 1st place.
I will suggest that you don't dig out old cases like this anymore. It serves no help and in fact it may cause more negative effects on you.
Cheers