what happen to Tribute to drumma, deadpoet thread?


Status
Not open for further replies.

ptwong

Senior Member
Could mods advice why has the above thread been removed?
 

I removed both "tribute" threads - the one by mattlock and the one by Buckteeth.

They are in violation of CS terms of use, items 1, 5 and 6.
 

As a curious bystander, can you explain why, if both threads were in violation of CS terms of use, one thread was allowed to run for several days, however, once the other thread appeared, it was pulled within 1 hour ?
 

I can imagine that there were individual posts in these threads that may have been in violation but to delete the entire threads? If that was the basis on which these entire threads were deleted then 1/2 the threads in CS would need to be deleted.

It seems that the slope down which CS is headed is getting steeper by the day. I think it may be time to change the logo to something like "alienate long time contributers at all costs".
 

I can imagine that there were individual posts in these threads that may have been in violation but to delete the entire threads? If that was the basis on which these entire threads were deleted then 1/2 the threads in CS would need to be deleted.

It seems that the slope down which CS is headed is getting steeper by the day. I think it may be time to change the logo to something like "alienate long time contributers at all costs".

Its very clear what and why those threads are deleted. Flamewars are always something we try to avoid at all costs.

CS values long time contributors but that doesnt mean when we delete post, it means we are alienating any member. You folks have a choice of posting, but that doesnt mean CS has to accept every posts. We have the right to edit or delete post as we feel is for the best of our forum.

For most of the times, we tried to keep things in low profile to avoid direct confrontation online. I don't like to engage in a full PR war with any member or website but if this is what it takes to protect the interest of this forum, we will stand up for ourselves.

I appreciate suggestions to make things better, but just comments like yours aren't helping. In fact it makes things worse.
 

As a curious bystander, can you explain why, if both threads were in violation of CS terms of use, one thread was allowed to run for several days, however, once the other thread appeared, it was pulled within 1 hour ?

Admins and Mods are volunteers who don't work fulltime here. We have work, family and life outside the forum to manage. And even when we are online, we don't scan all sub-forums. I personally don't scan all threads in Kopitiam. We really on mods/SU and members to notifiy us if theres anything that needs our attention.

Even we are notified of certain threads, we need time to read thru and evaluate the content. Alot of you may think we just delete posts without reading or understanding what is it about. And there are lots of time things arent that simple right from the start. We need time to digest. There are times that we need to seek comments from other bystander because we may not even know whats actually happening.

Its really hard to manage every member expectations here. Just quoting one member msg to me,

Don't enforce rule, get complained, enforce rule also get complained.

If you guys are asking for SLAs (1-5 min, 1 hour, 1 day, etc..) on the mode of operation in this forum, let me know. I will look into how we can engage full time staffs for this forum.

Alternatively if anyone feels they can do a better job in moderating one of the most controversial subforum in CS, I am more than happy to engage his/her help.
 

Thanks Jason. Rather do business, link up business opportunities for clubsnap rather than engaging in any flame wars.

But I do think its necessary to clarify on the posting of Drumma's original pictures in a Open forum in Clubsnap. Do we want to encourage young photographers to shoot such pictures and package it as Art? Post it here and use Drumma's precedent to justify its legitimacy?

Just food for thought.

Thanks for your special kind attention on this.

Cheers,
Tuck
 

Thanks Jason. Rather do business, link up business opportunities for clubsnap rather than engaging in any flame wars.

But I do think its necessary to clarify on the posting of Drumma's original pictures in a Open forum in Clubsnap. Do we want to encourage young photographers to shoot such pictures and package it as Art? Post it here and use Drumma's precedent to justify its legitimacy?

Just food for thought.

Thanks for your special kind attention on this.

Cheers,
Tuck

Please use report post feature . I have no visibility of what you are referring.
 

This incident happened more than a year ago. He has since change the pictures to links and finally removed the picture links/post entirely when I messaged him

Subsequent action that lead to the current situation, which i felt moderators should not have commented on Drumma's action initially
http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=224080

As for the pictures he posted. I reposted under this thread that you have removed for everyone and the admin to comment.

Just need you kind folks to make a statement and set the record right once and for all. The CS threads can be googled nowadays and the bashing and flaming arent doing anyone good.

Hence, for the no of days that my tribute thread has been on and the short duration of my tribute back to them. I dont even have a chance to clarify a lot of stuff. Hope you can understand how I feel when business associates come and talk to me about this.

Nevertheless, its a tough job balancing all these and I salute you guys for all the hardwork. Nothing is perfect but making a strong stand will certainly make CS a better place.

Cheers,
Tuck

PS: I even have friends from the media and papers asking what is going on, why I did not counter all the damages ditch out by them. Wanna interview us for front page etc.
 

Here are the pictures again that sparked this 2 year flame war.







Should CS allows budding photographers to post such pictures as art and send out a wrong message to all young photographers that its ok to shoot such pictures as art. Long time contributors are supporting his action.
 

If you find these images so distasteful, why do you continue to post them? That is twice this morning!
 

Sorry - double post - internet sucks today
 

Here are the pictures again that sparked this 2 year flame war.

Should CS allows budding photographers to post such pictures as art and send out a wrong message to all young photographers that its ok to shoot such pictures as art. Long time contributors are supporting his action.


I believe we have made our stand very clear, pictures like these will be deleted. I cant possilbly define the exact lines on what allowed and disallowed since no one can ever come up with a clear definition. But we do work on case by case basis on these issues.
 

Here are the pictures again that sparked this 2 year flame war.

Should CS allows budding photographers to post such pictures as art and send out a wrong message to all young photographers that its ok to shoot such pictures as art. Long time contributors are supporting his action.

Tuck,

I wonder why u ask "Should CS allows budding photographers to post such pictures as art and send out a wrong message to all young photographers"?

Shd or shd not seriously, it's doesn't matter, cos there's is nothing to debate abt...
 

If you find these images so distasteful, why do you continue to post them? That is twice this morning!

Because the CS threads can be googled and NPNT? What would you have done if you are in my shoes. I just need to have options. Perhaps the admin can decide and make a statement, remove the flaming posts from http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=224080

But I am willing to listen to your opinions and comments

Do you support the propaganda style ditch out by many CSers to support the shooting of these pictures? Make your stand first, then we can have a meaningful discussion?

Any options from Csers here to resolve this issue once and for all is greatly appreciated.
 

Tuck,

I wonder why u ask "Should CS allows budding photographers to post such pictures as art and send out a wrong message to all young photographers"?

Shd or shd not seriously, it's doesn't matter, cos there's is nothing to debate abt...

Would you like to make comments and have your pictures taken in a exclusive front page interview with a famous tabloid newspaper? Your insight on this matter will help make the report balanced?

Cheers
 

I believe we have made our stand very clear, pictures like these will be deleted. I cant possilbly define the exact lines on what allowed and disallowed since no one can ever come up with a clear definition. But we do work on case by case basis on these issues.

Thanks for your quick statement on this matter. Would really appreciate if you can remove the equally flaming components in http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=224080

Since any google search will lead to a lot of misinformation and drawbacks for me.

Sorry for all the troubles created.
 

Thanks for your quick statement on this matter. Would really appreciate if you can remove the equally flaming components in http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=224080

Since any google search will lead to a lot of misinformation and drawbacks for me.

Sorry for all the troubles created.

Tuck, we have already removed the offending pictures and I consider this case is closed.

I can't possibly go back to every backdated post and work on it. I believe I have made my stand very clear in my previous post.

In fact, if you have not digged out that thread for reference, many people won't have remember or know about this. And people dont usually google search for a specific case like this unless they have some good or bad intents in the 1st place.

I will suggest that you don't dig out old cases like this anymore. It serves no help and in fact it may cause more negative effects on you.

Cheers
 

Tuck, we have already removed the offending pictures and I consider this case is closed.

I can't possibly go back to every backdated post and work on it. I believe I have made my stand very clear in my previous post.

Yes, thanks. Ya must go out and cool down and think through this later.

A million thanks for your kind assistance on this matter.

Cheers,
Tuck
 

Tuck, we have already removed the offending pictures and I consider this case is closed.

I can't possibly go back to every backdated post and work on it. I believe I have made my stand very clear in my previous post.

In fact, if you have not digged out that thread for reference, many people won't have remember or know about this. And people dont usually google search for a specific case like this unless they have some good or bad intents in the 1st place.

I will suggest that you don't dig out old cases like this anymore. It serves no help and in fact it may cause more negative effects on you.

Cheers

Thanks Jason, you hit the nail. Its the bad intent that is worrisome la. :(

Well let's move on and see what happens next.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top