Haha, that's concise!Astin said:10 words:
Nikon lens, Canon camera, Fuji sensor, Sony marketing, Panasonic quality.
Astin said:10 words:
Nikon lens, Canon camera, Fuji sensor, Sony marketing, Panasonic quality.
JediForce4ever said:Nikon-Always one gen. behind Canon.
ok..my bad..icarus said:Are u sure? :think: :sweat: :sweat:
The only thing behind canon is the lack of a FF DSLR thats all.
Yes IMHO Panasonic quality (quality control, quality assurance, reliability) is better than the rest.redstone said:If you don't mind me asking... Panasoice good ah? :think:
redstone said:If you don't mind me asking... Panasoice good ah? :think:
i owned and keep the panasonic fz1 despite owning and trying out the flwg cameras during the course of one year... canon a95, nikon 5400, olympus c-5050redstone said:If you don't mind me asking... Panasoice good ah? :think:
Doesn't matter as long as the images are nicer than Canon's (IMHO).. Canon sensors/image processing engine removes noise better but it also tend to remove the detail and thus making the pictures look flat. Then again, it might be the optics also, otherwise why would EOS users want to fit Nikon lenses on their EOS bodies?JediForce4ever said:ok..my bad..
Nikon-One gen behind Canon in DSLR sensors.
There's a Kodak FF F-mount.icarus said:Are u sure? :think: :sweat: :sweat:
The only thing behind canon is the lack of a FF DSLR thats all.