not so much lar.... about 40% more... but still very substantial!
Tokina 16-50 f2.8
- Thread starter mug326
- Start date
- Status
not so much lar.... about 40% more... but still very substantial!
Daedalus Trent
Senior Member
still... Tamron has a much better rep than Tokina :think:
You pay for the more solid build for the Tokina. But i understand the CA's bad. Is the CA really that bad on a 4R print? Any users care to share?
Tamron's a more plasticky feel, but the printout is much shaper. Less CA as compared to the Tokina model.
Daedalus Trent
Senior Member
well, imho i won't be tossing my lens all over the place, so build isn't much of an issue for me
and yea, you have a point. any user willing to post examples?
Yeah, there's really only one choice here man.
Daedalus Trent
Senior Member
nope i got mine at 750 from op plus free uv filter... not even reach 880 but up 4 this lens i love doing potraiture and it give me a soft look... not so sharp wich is perfect 4 potraiture!
ahh...thanks for confirming. $880 seemed kinda ridiculous :bsmilie:
Still....Its a few hundred more than Tamron :think:
Yeah. Tamron is 585 at CP.
Plus you can find a lot more 2nd hand Tamrons here at the BnS.
Got mine for $450.
- Status
Similar threads
