The Random Thread- SEASON 4!! (we present a lucky 4 digit number to u. 1576)

[qwerty628]

cca starting soon. headache headache...

lol...wad cca?

 

[spree86]

lol...wad cca?

Chinese Dance:bsmilie:

 

[bonrya]

Chinese Dance:bsmilie:

Not ballet meh? :dunno:

 

[spree86]

Not ballet meh? :dunno:

Hahaha fusion dance:bsmilie:

 

[kei1309]

Hahaha fusion dance:bsmilie:

it's the chicken dance :bsmilie:

 

[kwanhan]

... or issit final fantasy 7 fan club?

 

[spree86]

... or issit final fantasy 7 fan club?

Or XMM IR shooting club?:think:

 

[SurrealDreamWalker]

ai-ya... it is bollywood belly-dance.

if not, then it is middle-east belly-dance.

and if not, then it is brazilian belly-dance.

 

[qwerty628]

Or XMM IR shooting club?:think:

trying to imagine :bsmilie:

 

[spree86]

ai-ya... it is bollywood belly-dance.

if not, then it is middle-east belly-dance.

and if not, then it is brazilian belly-dance.

Hmm... Allen in a bra and skirt... BLEH!!!

 

[kei1309]

Hmm... Allen in a bra and skirt... BLEH!!!

eeks! non-straight pedo bear!

 

[spree86]

eeks! non-straight pedo bear!

Hahaha, if you had seen Allen in a bra, you would be attracted as well :bsmilie:

 

[leowyien]

Hahaha, if you had seen Allen in a bra, you would be attracted as well :bsmilie:

:bsmilie::bsmilie::bsmilie::bigeyes:

 

[leowyien]

lol...wad cca?

Photog...
wait its

Or XMM IR shooting club?:think:

:thumbsup:

 

[spree86]

Photog...
wait its

:thumbsup:

Hahaha most popular club in sch!!

Btw, saw yr canon section post, you cfm buying 17-50?

 

[kei1309]

Hahaha most popular club in sch!!

Btw, saw yr canon section post, you cfm buying 17-50?

cfm also stands for something else besides the word "confirm" :bsmilie:

FWAH. 17-50?

 

[leowyien]

Hahaha most popular club in sch!!

Btw, saw yr canon section post, you cfm buying 17-50?

Dunno leh suddenly they say 17-70 better hsm and os leh, at a reasonably good price..

The 20mm difference…

When shooting with the two lenses, the most immediate difference would be the difference in focal lengths. However, considering that the actual difference amounts to about 30mm (multiplied by crop factor), it is not insurmountable by taking a few steps. However, the issue of perspective previously discussed would remain. Does that mean that the 17-70mm should be the obvious choice? The answer is of course not so simple as everything in photography is about trade-offs. With a longer lens, you will naturally lose out on clarify and so the image quality would be inferior. How much worse would vary from case by case but in this comparison, I would say the difference is not as pronounced as I would expect but you can expect the Tamron to shoot better within its range, especially as it would be stopped down slightly to give like for like comparison against the Sigma. Keeping in mind that lenses are usually at their best when stopped down 1 to 2 stops from the maximum aperture, it's no surprise that the Tamron is a touch better. Mind you, it's not enough of a difference to write off the Sigma 17-70mm. Keep in mind though that the Tamron can be likened to the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 in comparison to the Canon 24-105mm f/4… For those who demand higher quality, the 24-70mm is the obvious choice while those who demand flexibility will go for the 24-105mm. It's really down to what you need for your shooting.

What a trusted source says- Side by side comparison

Why anw?

 

[qwerty628]

17-70 no constant 2.8 right? Its 2.8-4 iirc. Tammy 17-50 enjoys a pretty good rep tho

 

[leowyien]

cfm also stands for something else besides the word "confirm" :bsmilie:

? Capital Financial Management?

FWAH. 17-50?

yupyup

 

[leowyien]

17-70 no constant 2.8 right? Its 2.8-4 iirc. Tammy 17-50 enjoys a pretty good rep tho

Ya google thouroughly and found the sig not sharp wideopen so See here (propaganda)