ken111111 said:then they must be super greedy .... :bsmilie:
wat u waiting for bro, go post ur nice pics again...
ken111111 said:then they must be super greedy .... :bsmilie:
hazekang said:wat u waiting for bro, go post ur nice pics again...![]()
Deadpoet said:this is the BIGGEST crog of sh*t I have heard from the board and the BIGGEST joke also.
first of all, I did not receive the PM, since I don't shoot events and never post, but based on what I read posted on this thread, the event organiser are typical brainless morons who probably thought, if they had a brain they may think, but since I cannot think of a better word, I will use think ... wow, so many photog taking pictures, wow, they did not ask me for permission ... why don't I scare them into giving me the pictures so that I can use them for free ...
if it is true that the only motive is to compare the pictures taken/posted to those that got leeched, why need high resolution/A4 size files/images?
this is a blatant attempt to exercise strong arm tactics where the biggest fist wins mentality. i hope none of the photog that posted abide to this ridiculus request.
hazekang said:compare whose muscle bigger loh...
nyxx88 said:If agencies are TRULY concerned about protecting the models' pictures from being 'exploited', then they should have a clause in their contracts that disallow models from taking part in public events such as this.
The photogs are an innocent party in this whole thing. But in this case, seems like the organizers may be the ones who's behind this & not the agencies.
mpenza said:before things get carried away..... from what I read, Jodie Tan conveyed requests, rather than demands, from the company (it could be worded better I suppose but still not exactly hostile). Now, it's up to ken111111 to decide what to do and negotiate with them for compensation for the pictures if he wants to give the pictures.
vince123123 said:Upon a further reading of the message, it looks like that you are correct. Since the message was conveyed in the form of a "request", all those concerned have to do is to convey a polite declining of the request and the request-maker should have to contend with that, since it is, a request.
Brutally honest. I love you.Deadpoet said:this is the BIGGEST crog of sh*t I have heard from the board and the BIGGEST joke also.
first of all, I did not receive the PM, since I don't shoot events and never post, but based on what I read posted on this thread, the event organiser are typical brainless morons who probably thought, if they had a brain they may think, but since I cannot think of a better word, I will use think ... wow, so many photog taking pictures, wow, they did not ask me for permission ... why don't I scare them into giving me the pictures so that I can use them for free ...
if it is true that the only motive is to compare the pictures taken/posted to those that got leeched, why need high resolution/A4 size files/images?
this is a blatant attempt to exercise strong arm tactics where the biggest fist wins mentality. i hope none of the photog that posted abide to this ridiculus request.
a note to jodie, disassocite yourself from these ppl, will only make you a persona non grata on the board. you are getting there fast already.
this is my opinion, if you don't like it, sue me!
Nope, the organisers should do it, else JT might get flamed once more for being a middleman.mpenza said:Have suggested to Jodie Tan to come in to clarify. Let's hear what she has to say.
espn said:Nope, the organisers should do it, else JT might get flamed once more for being a middleman.
espn said:Nope, the organisers should do it, else JT might get flamed once more for being a middleman.
mpenza said:before things get carried away..... from what I read, Jodie Tan conveyed requests, rather than demands, from the company (it could be worded better I suppose but still not exactly hostile). Now, it's up to ken111111 to decide what to do and negotiate with them for compensation for the pictures if he wants to give the pictures.