blazer_workz
Senior Member
image appears very soft..maybe due to a not so good lens use for testing..
but tat day dinner, i try using MASter 5DMII wif a 16-35..i find images softer oso..
Tang Shooters LIII: TCSS Thread...
- Thread starter blazer_workz
- Start date
- Status
image appears very soft..maybe due to a not so good lens use for testing..
but tat day dinner, i try using MASter 5DMII wif a 16-35..i find images softer oso..
be sextified with what the dark side can offer hehehe
I guess ... canon lens need to stop down few stops to get really sharp images.. 16-35 mk2 is no exception.
oic...all along tot 16-35 has much better optics than 17-40 & it is sharp wide open...
since they say nikon zoom lens better, canon primes better right?
IMHO, Nikon zoom with Nano coating is definitely better. I had used both 24-70s.
As for primes, Canon is better due to their bigger apertures which Nikon still lacks in many of their Nikkor AF primes lineup. L primes are 1.4 or faster in the 24 to 85 focal length range. Fastest Nikon primes still in production today in the comparble range are 50F1.4 and 85F1.4. There used to be an AF28F1.4 but price is exorbitant iirc.
IMHO, Nikon zoom with Nano coating is definitely better. I had used both 24-70s.
As for primes, Canon is better due to their bigger apertures which Nikon still lacks in many of their Nikkor AF primes lineup. L primes are 1.4 or faster in the 24 to 85 focal length range. Fastest Nikon primes still in production today in the comparble range are 50F1.4 and 85F1.4. There used to be an AF28F1.4 but price is exorbitant iirc.
informative :thumbsup::thumbsup:
i'm not a technical person..just use! hahahahah
Awalk winner use anything oso can win awalk de...I understand...;p
sharp is a subjective word... :sweat:
it appears to be sharp to someone, but soft to another, and then low in contrast to someone else... I suppose Blazer standard is belly belly high... :think:
pui pui!! hahahha
i tink mine also...always must zoom in check..stock photo so strict:dunno:
I soooo long didn't post stock photos liao...
recently I fell sick, then the virus spread to my 2 kids and wife also.. the whole family sick :bsmilie:
Now my istock earnings is only US$11.68 only ... after soooo long..
carnage3630
Member
US$11.68 enough for ur family to see doc...
BTW any advice a few stock sites you two stock guru used?
woofmy
New Member
my family medical fees is like several hundred one leh.. :sweat:
never mind, next time you will know.....
I only use http://www.istockphoto.com/index.php
I think Sprintist uses both istock and dreamstime http://www.dreamstime.com/
see doc at polyclinic..not family doctor haha
anyway billy, wishing everyone get well soon too..the season of giving dunch give virus hahah BBB virus also included LOL jk
i recommend shutterstock
nakashimamika
Senior Member
allo butties
me ish going SBG soot with school photography crub
simpleliving
New Member
- Status
Similar threads
