Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 VC USD


Will appreciate more photos at the 300mm end on APS-C, especially those on nature like small animals and birds. I am also very interested in this lens. Thanks alot.
 

I got this lens from Alan photo last week at $700 nett cash only payment. Nets will cost 2% more so just pay cash…
At 300mm..even with the VC on, handheld i find it very hard to get the subject not blur…shutter speed really needs to be very fast…However at 300mm, don't expect it to be sharp and it autofocus very noisy and slow..And sometimes the autofocus doesn't work..have to use manual focus…if not it will just keep hunting to focus non stop..Those are the bad points..

But the good thing is, it's pretty light..even lighter than my other lenses…it's also cheaper than most lenses and well, you get 300mm….that;s useful when you really need it..
At $700, i have absolutely no complains about it…definately worth the money..

Some sample shots taken with this lens at 300mm.

216401_10150157354022861_532212860_6723767_17941_n.jpg

205522_10150155677592861_532212860_6710384_934534_n.jpg
 

If it's for nikon mount, I dun see y one couldn't spend $30 more to get original nikon 70-300mm VR. Silent focusing with good IQ.
 

If it's for nikon mount, I dun see y one couldn't spend $30 more to get original nikon 70-300mm VR. Silent focusing with good IQ.

there's some comparison on these 2 lens... the T is sharper at centers and corners through out all focal length at its widest... especially on a FF body....
remember I read it some where haha... thats why I chose the T over the N...
 

DSC_4099.jpg

shot @ 300mm w/o VC on.... no edit done except for cropping and resizing...
not too bad... I pressume on a crop body will be much much better....
 

Last edited:
Just got mine at jb(angsana), cost about sdg622.. Really worth it after test it..
 

$100 diff might worth the change. The only problems left are noise and resale value of 3rd party lenses.
 

One thing i noticed also..not sure if it's just me…but it doesn't lock in perfectly like original Canon lenses…There's about 1 or 2 mm freeplay when in place…quite irritating really..
 

I have been testing this lens quite alot lately…Couple of stuff i found and in need some opinions from fellow owners

1) The 70mm is more "zoomed" at 70mm as compared to my Canon 24-105L at 70mm.

2) For long exposures (more than 1sec), the VC has to be turned off! If not it's always blur! No such issues with Canon IS

3) For handheld fast shutter faster than 1/100, the lens actually is clearer for me with VC off then ON….Am I the only one or does the VC not really work at all? Instead of making the shot clear, more often than not, i get it blur…Maybe for slower shutter it might work? I'm not sure…Anyone else experimented with this lens and has similar issues as I do?
 

Last edited:
VC should work in most speed under 1/500. At above it's not useful except to eat your battery.
 

This lens is so tempting to get!!! Specially the GST package is coming in!!! LOL
 

5568187230_266561f026_b_d.jpg


Like this lens a lot. My first copy was underexposed by 2stops, had it replaced at JEL.
 

I was in Budapest for a short holiday over easter, and I visited the zoo as it was near hero square. I use the tammy to try my hand on animal shots. Few things to note about this lens.
1. The VC drains battery life fast.
2. If panning, turn VC off. It keep compensating for horizontal shift.
3. When I used AI servo for moving animals, I need to switch VC off so that it can focus better.
4. @ 300mm it is a little soft wide open.
5. Definitely need to turn off VC when mounted on tripod and taking long exposure

Overall, I am very happy with this lens. I definitely prefer this to the efs 55-200mm (kanna stolen in St.Peter). VC does it job, but is not as smart as canon IS. Initially I wanted to get the canon 70-300 L or the 100-400 L, but hanging a great white around the neck when overseas just attract really unnecessary attention. I do not travel with groups, and east/west Europe is not that safe. Last thing I need is to get singled out and targeted. I would recommend this tammy for those who need a good tele-zoom lens for travel, and want to keep a low profile.

These are some of the photos I took using this lens @ the zoo. PP done on white balance and tone adjustment. Did not sharpen nor reduce noise. No cropping, and taken with a 7D.

Note that the odd grid like bokeh is due to the cage bars between me and the subject.

Leopard - 300mm, f/5.6, iso200, 1/30sec. She was perching on a tree trunk, and stared at me wonder what I was doing.
5666154356_5a8a1c838d_z.jpg


Tundra Wolf - 270mm, f/5.6, iso800, 1/400sec. Had to use higher iso so i can freeze the wolf movement. they were moving around the cage.
5666159410_be1537cfbc_z.jpg
 

Last edited:
I was in Budapest for a short holiday over easter, and I visited the zoo as it was near hero square. I use the tammy to try my hand on animal shots. Few things to note about this lens.
1. The VC drains battery life fast.
2. If panning, turn VC off. It keep compensating for horizontal shift.
3. When I used AI servo for moving animals, I need to switch VC off so that it can focus better.
4. @ 300mm it is a little soft wide open.
5. Definitely need to turn off VC when mounted on tripod and taking long exposure

Overall, I am very happy with this lens. I definitely prefer this to the efs 55-200mm (kanna stolen in St.Peter). VC does it job, but is not as smart as canon IS. Initially I wanted to get the canon 70-300 L or the 100-400 L, but hanging a great white around the neck when overseas just attract really unnecessary attention. I do not travel with groups, and east/west Europe is not that safe. Last thing I need is to get singled out and targeted. I would recommend this tammy for those who need a good tele-zoom lens for travel, and want to keep a low profile.

These are some of the photos I took using this lens @ the zoo. PP done on white balance and tone adjustment. Did not sharpen nor reduce noise. No cropping, and taken with a 7D.

Note that the odd grid like bokeh is due to the cage bars between me and the subject.

Leopard - 300mm, f/5.6, iso200, 1/30sec. She was perching on a tree trunk, and stared at me wonder what I was doing.
5666154356_5a8a1c838d_z.jpg


Tundra Wolf - 270mm, f/5.6, iso800, 1/400sec. Had to use higher iso so i can freeze the wolf movement. they were moving around the cage.
5666159410_be1537cfbc_z.jpg

Pretty good at the long end. Thanks for the photos.
 

I agree…the VC is good but not smart and doesn't work well with moving subjects. IQ of this lens is not perfect…BUT it's a discreet lens and at 700g with a 300mm capability…and a $700 price tag…what more can you ask for…I'm very happy with mine…will bring it out for a zoo test one day..
 

Wish it has an option for lens tripod collar. it will be easier to use on a monopod or tripod.
 

It's so light, why bother to add a collar to increase the cost of this lens?
 

I know, just wish a universal one is avail to use for myself ... :) I dislocated my left thumb recently and it really hurt when I grip the lens too long. My main worry is that it will pop out again, and it hurt badly when I had to set it back.

Now, I use a monopod, but it is not really balance when I mount it directly to the camera, i still need to use my left hand to support the lens.
 

Ah, then I can understand. I would opt a sturdier tripod/ballhead than a single use lens collar though. maybe a longer arca Swiss plate for a compatible ballhead will be better?
 

Back
Top