twisted illusion
Senior Member
equivalent to EF-S
i came to understand that Sigma DC/DG both can mount into Canon EF... so my next question... can tamron Di-II mount into canon EF hole... thks..
equivalent to EF-S
i came to understand that Sigma DC/DG both can mount into Canon EF... so my next question... can tamron Di-II mount into canon EF hole... thks..
yes, but of cuz you will get heavy vignetting.
erm... every canon body it call EF mount.. just.. 5D2 below the sensor it slightly further due to EF-S("Electro-Focus-Shortback)lens mount... if not how ef lens mount,mounted in crop rate camera.. =)
With serious competition from this lens (if IQ is good), I'm hoping canon will reduce their price on their 17-55 f2.8 IS![]()
...5D2 below the sensor it slightly further due to EF-S("Electro-Focus-Shortback)lens mount...
I was really wonder if Canon will release an updated 17-55 "L" IS USM lens to go with 7D... lolxit will only happened in our dream. unless canon have new lens in this class.
imho VC/IS/VR not very critical at 18-50mm ba.
dont think is really worth it to pay more for the VC unless >100mm??
i might be wrong though
imho VC/IS/VR not very critical at 18-50mm ba.
dont think is really worth it to pay more for the VC unless >100mm??
i might be wrong though
Agreed with u. Feel that it may not be worth to spend $100 or much more for VC to support the short range till 50mm.
Sometimes i will worry that such 'good to have' function will breakdown and i may have to spend additional $ for servicing it :sweat:
So it would be better to purchase the older version of the 17-50 2.8 without the VC right? Get to save up some cash.