rain5533
Senior Member
Your shot looks overexposed. If you shot at ISO 3200, and maintain the same aperture and shutter speed, the picture will be ok, and with less noise too.
Thanks your advise, but i don't have D700 anymore
Your shot looks overexposed. If you shot at ISO 3200, and maintain the same aperture and shutter speed, the picture will be ok, and with less noise too.
Thanks your advise, but i don't have D700 anymore![]()
Same applies to your D800 or D7000. It is always about metering right.
hi, i have a problem deciding which nikon to get...i have sold my 5D2 and all the L lenses and am been confused which nikon to get..the options are D700,D800, D3 or D3s.. I shoot wedding and prewedding.. so i need good iso handling most of the time..high dynamic range would be awesome but not the key point..
which of 4 you guys thinking? with pros n cons please
thanks
If you got D7000 i was notice the auto exposed may not accurate, sometime is over an sometime is normal..
anything can advise to solve up?
Thanks
You need to know how to meter and what to meter. Then how to use EV compensation in what situation. The meter is not 100%. It help you to bring it close, then you as the photographer have to fine tune the exposure. That is what photographers supposed to do. The 3 metering modes are also available for you to use. You need to know when to use which metering mode. When to use matrix, when to use center weighted and when to use spot.
Thank you..![]()
In the end, if you shoot for money, one of your concerns will be ROI. D700 is one of the best options as it gives the best bang for the buck. If you want ultimate ISO performance D4 is king now. followed by D3s. High ISO performance of the D3s is around 1.5 stops of the D700/D3. But question is, do you really need to shoot at 12800 for weddings? How many weddings do you need to shoot to break even on your equipment?
please don't tell me you go out to shoot a wedding with half charge battery and didn't bring any back up batteries? and you really need to shoot more than two thousand images for a wedding?
imo its not a fantastic move to switch from Canon to Nikon based on the reasons. So many wedding photographers are using 5DmkII... if you want something new and fresh to start over, D800/D4 would be a "safer" buy to you.
Hi, brother just depend on your budget lah... Cause now you holding is 5d2 an same level as D700 with the value also.
If you got extra cash why not jump to D3s and play with low light consider with non used speed light for some condition.
Last time mine is using the D700 the ISO4000 I used with is due to my SB-900 overheated.
The results on RAW as 4000 ISO still acceptable.
But make sure got f2.8 Fixed Zoom lens.
![]()
i always thought that people especially pro don't just change from one to another brand. especially because of the investments made in lenses. And even if they do, its usually because they have tried the other system and they like that setup better than their existing one. And never will they be without a system i.e sell off everything and then ask what system to buy. As someone said the logical upgrade was the 5dmk3 as that addressed the issues you had. . but oh well... the d4 and the D800 do come close in High iso performance in the new Nikon range and the d3s and d700 if your looking for the older generation
what about vice versa? nikon to canon? IMHO, it's normal after you use your camera for a while and now its limitation. D800 seems a nice camera to shoot landscape, products but not so much needed of MP for wedding..as D4, it's way out of my budget![]()
I was planning to switch to D700 but the price is a bit too high of the 2nd hand..is there any signficant difference between D3s n D4? from what i know, there is none..
yes i do need to shoot 12800 when there is only few dimmed lights.. well camera for me is an investment, i think i need about 8months to break even
If budget is not a concern, get the D4. I think it is probably the most well balanced camera in Nikon's line up for the new generation of cameras released in 2012, the size may put some off but if you are a pro, you will probably have a batt/vert grip anyway. The XQD card can be a pain to get and it is still very expensive and limited to lower capacities until later in the year.
The D800 and D800E are not just for landscapes, don't let the high megapixels fool you. They work very well for weddings and almost anything else, the only problem is that you will need bigger memory cards or just get used to changing more often because the files are huge.
The D700 is still a great workhorse and I know of a few wedding photographers that use it with no intention of upgrading in the near future.
The D3/s I have no experience with so I can't comment but I have only heard good things about them from others.
In my opinion, moving systems is a real pain, more often than not it is the lens that makes my decision for me and not the body.
Seriously..im getting really confused here..I was planning to switch to D700 but the price is a bit too high of the 2nd hand..is there any signficant difference between D3s n D4? from what i know, there is none..
i have no right to comment much,since I'm guilty of switching now and then
but i feel that both brands are good enough for any needs
After so much of talk, D700 is sufficient for weddings and many genres of photography.
If you have spare cash, D3 or D3s. Are you looking into second hand?
Perhaps another D7000 for backup body.
If then you didn't sell away your 5DmkII, I would strongly recommend you keep to it together with your L lenses.
The only thing you could change is your mindset. If you really wanna change, no one could stop your heart. There is really nothing much to justify here. ;p
If budget is not a concern, get the D4. I think it is probably the most well balanced camera in Nikon's line up for the new generation of cameras released in 2012, the size may put some off but if you are a pro, you will probably have a batt/vert grip anyway. The XQD card can be a pain to get and it is still very expensive and limited to lower capacities until later in the year.
The D800 and D800E are not just for landscapes, don't let the high megapixels fool you. They work very well for weddings and almost anything else, the only problem is that you will need bigger memory cards or just get used to changing more often because the files are huge.
The D700 is still a great workhorse and I know of a few wedding photographers that use it with no intention of upgrading in the near future.
The D3/s I have no experience with so I can't comment but I have only heard good things about them from others.
In my opinion, moving systems is a real pain, more often than not it is the lens that makes my decision for me and not the body.
expensive in term of the price now compared before D800 released.and for that price i feel expensive for 2008 Released cameraIf you find D700 expensive... how do you find prices of D3s or D4?
D3s and D4 are quite different. Apart a one stop improvement in high ISO performance, D4 also offer a newer AF and metering system, as well as wifi capabilities never before seen in a digital camera, like remote Liveview, remote control, all from a portable mobile device. I guess you need to research more, seems like you have not been doing your own research on this.
8 months to break even? how many weddings is that? 16-20 weddings? That is not very good ROI...
Seriously..im getting really confused here..
Now you say D700 price is high..(even after considering 2nd hand) Then at the very first place...you mention D800..D3s..? Pls enlighten me.