= Stefan's Weekly Singapore City/Landscapes =


Status
Not open for further replies.
EDIT: Just saw it. Damn, this liquifying thing looks complicated. Never used it before... :(
It's usually used for portraits to help women lose weight in a matter of seconds:

[vid]tR4GoLk0o50[/vid]

A picture says a thousand words, so this is what I had in mind. Let me know if you want me to take the link down:

http://i1087.photobucket.com/albums/j463/rulergod/6499051497_1ac5650f1a_b.jpg

Note the verticals of the jetty platforms and the light reflections too. It's a quick job, probably would not stand up large, but well, it would not take more than 5-10 minutes once you've gotten the hang of it.
 

Last edited:
Oh man dude, that looks awesome! I'll try that out when I get there again some time next week (And when the sky's good) Thanks for the tip edutilos!! :D
 

6529077547_f04d537c65_b.jpg


December Sorrow
5 Image HDR/DRI using GND 0.9 soft + GND 0.6 hard for higher tonality of the clouds. Sembawang Stateland, Singapore.

Revisited the area again as I like the fog after a rain the night before. Boosted the highlights a bit.
 

Last edited:
December Sorrow[/center]
5 Image HDR/DRI using GND 0.9 soft + GND 0.6 hard for higher tonality of the clouds. Sembawang Stateland, Singapore.

Revisited the area again as I like the fog after a rain the night before. Boosted the highlights a bit.

The fog is super! Really like this one!
 

6529940065_ecdf28b35e_b.jpg


Immensity II: A Short-lived Friend

7 Image HDR/DRI using GND 0.9 soft + GND 0.6 hard for higher tonality for the clouds & sky.
-2 EV as base image before tone mapping.
-3 EV + 0 EV for foreground & tracks, tone mapped. Sembawang Stateland, Singapore.

Only slightly different from the other series I've shot so far. The sunrise was a short-lived one; out of sheer luck, it disappeared into the dark stormy clouds completely just after this was taken.

Chose an underexposed (-2 EV) shot as original image from my bracketing exposures, so that the sun's halo is naturally captured. Secondly, an underexposed shot helps the sun to distinctively stand out more against the entire background.

PS, I love Lee filters. Sure they are expensive, but never had any colour cast issues when I stacked them!!! Rock on, Lee!!
 

Last edited:
5 Image HDR/DRI using GND 0.9 soft + GND 0.6 hard for higher tonality of the clouds. Sembawang Stateland, Singapore.

Revisited the area again as I like the fog after a rain the night before. Boosted the highlights a bit.
Love the scene and composition. A pity that the use of the hard GND has resulted in a very obvious transition where the line ends. (Layering would be such a pain to retain the details in the tree branches that merge with the sky though.)
 

Hi edutilos!! Thanks, no it was actually the fog that kinda look it was. LOL. I placed the hard GND (The lowest, bottom part/the end of the transitional edge) just over the tip of the top branches of the highest tree, checked it twice before I shot it... :D Lee filters tend to be a little more "soft edged" in the transition as opposed to hitech hard GNDs I noticed. Nevermind, thanks anyway, I'll see if I can fix that! ;)

PS, I LOVE your Art Science Museum shot!!! I should go there one of these days and find myself a nice angle to shoot the reflections. :)
 

Last edited:
Hi edutilos!! Thanks, no it was actually the fog that kinda look it was. LOL. I placed the hard GND (The lowest, bottom part/ the end of the transitional edge) just over the top branches of the highest tree, checked it twice before I shot it... :D Lee filters tend to be a little more "soft edged" in the transition as opposed to hitech hard GNDs I noticed. Nevermind, thanks anyway, I'll see if I can fix that! ;)

PS, I LOVE your Art Science Museum shot!!! I should go there one of these days and find myself a nice angle to shoot. :)

Hrm, ok. It looks to me as if the hard GND is at the lower red line in my link (posted below for illustration purposes), because there is an abrupt stoppage of details.. I myself only have soft Hi-tech GND filters, I don't really like using hard filters because if needed, a hard GND filter is easier to simulate in Photoshop given the right set of exposures compared to a soft GND filter.. So I might not be familiar with how hard GNDs work. So you actually stacked the hard GND higher, around the blue line?

http://i1087.photobucket.com/albums/j463/rulergod/6529077547_00e2c19b64_b.jpg

The sun is very well controlled in the last photo. Just out of curiosity, which version of this scene do you prefer? I myself prefer the first version you posted (with no reflection).
 

Hrm, ok. It looks to me as if the hard GND is at the lower red line in my link (posted below for illustration purposes), because there is an abrupt stoppage of details.. I myself only have soft Hi-tech GND filters, I don't really like using hard filters because if needed, a hard GND filter is easier to simulate in Photoshop given the right set of exposures compared to a soft GND filter.. So I might not be familiar with how hard GNDs work. So you actually stacked the hard GND higher, around the blue line?

http://i1087.photobucket.com/albums/j463/rulergod/6529077547_00e2c19b64_b.jpg

Yeah!! :D Especially for the last shot too. :) Actually, I put the transitional hard GND at the red line (Slightly above the highest branch in that shot), or maybe because is likely due to the effects of a stacked filter.... (I suspect this) Anyway, it's B&W, I look at it as an overall. No worries though, Lee tends to be soft at the transitional edge even for hard grads. ;) There was one time I used to own a 0.6 Hitech hard GND, goodness :bigeyes: the line of transition was so obvious I had to stop using it..... :bsmilie: Good thing I sold it away on eBay, saved up and got myself a Lee.

The sun is very well controlled in the last photo. Just out of curiosity, which version of this scene do you prefer? I myself prefer the first version you posted (with no reflection).

Thanks man!! Anyway, I too also preferred the first one. It's straight to the point, and gets to where I wanted the shot to look like, and what this place in Sembawang felt to me. That was like a once a life time shot I can ever get a sky and cloud, bent as though it arrows the tree. Because of that the elements including the tree, works and compliments the entire scene as a whole. Personally, if I critic my work on those versions I shot on different occasions, the ones with the reflections are kinda "crying out for attention" away from the main focal point of the shot. It's like there's two plotlines in a story; the audience may not get my intended purpose.

Then again, its mothernature's wish a rain shall fall upon and water shall stay .LOL. Anyway all these versions though, I would say.... hahahaha, the scene is based on... luck? LOL. Well not exactly "luck", but different weather and cloud settings in the morning I suppose... I just wanted to see how it looks like on different conditions like cloudy, rainy, clear. Etc....

Seriously, that place is Epic. I searched for that view and place all over the internet, making sure that I wasn't taking someone else's angle/view and thus decided to head there to investigate; I wanted to see what it looks like on different weather occasions as mentioned. =)
 

Last edited:
6534749625_66fee9a819_b.jpg


To a New World & Beyond [Panorama]

-2 Image HDR/DRI panorama consisting of 5 image DRI exposure each for the 2 images.

-Used GND 0.9 soft + GND 0.6 hard for higher tonality of the sky.

-Merged and tone mapped in Photoshop CS5. Contrast boosted by 30% for foreground & desaturated by 20% to emphasise the center. Sembawang Stateland, Singapore.

It's been a while since I did HDR/DRI panoramas. Never in a life time would I choose to do that again. You'll know why when you try it.
 

Last edited:
6534749625_76251ec88c_b.jpg


To a New World & Beyond [Panorama]

-2 Image HDR/DRI panorama consisting of 5 image DRI exposure each for the 2 images.

-Used GND 0.9 soft + GND 0.6 hard for higher tonality of the sky.

-Merged and tone mapped in Photoshop CS5. Contrast boosted by 30% for foreground & desaturated by 20% to emphasise the center. Sembawang Stateland, Singapore.

It's been a while since I did HDR/DRI panoramas. Never in a life time would I choose to do that again. You'll know why when you try it.

hi, can i ask what is GND 0.6 soft and GND 0.6 hard? where can i find this function? thanks.
 

Hi saDdyJ86! :)

GND stands for Graduated Neutral Density. These numbers, 0.6 and 0.9 denote how "dark" the dark parts are, 0.6 is brighter than 0.9, and 0.3 and the brightest of the lot. :) They are measured in stops, that correspond to the EV values on your camera. A GND is not a "function" that can be found on camera, but rather a rectangular (or square) piece of resin (Call it plastic if you will) that contain the dark and a clear side. :)

Basically, a GND darkens the sky because of the limited dynamic range of the camera. Thus also allowing slower shutter speeds and certain effects that usually "enhances" the sky to suit the dynamic range of what we see in our eyes.

GNDs come in "hard" and "soft" setups. Hard, as the name implies, a straight horizontal change with little or no graduation from the dark to the clear side. It looks something like this:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/17/424417.jpg

Soft GNDs, as the name implies, have longer gradation from dark to the clear side. The Soft GND is useful for situations where irregularity of the background or horizon exists; ie. mountains and buildings. To use a hard GND will create a straight gradation across the scene and will not look right at all. A soft GND looks like this:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/18/424418.jpg

Hope this helps. :D
 

6549691137_e436a3bc72_b.jpg


Flow Me Away

3 Image HDR/DRI using GND 0.9 soft + GND 0.6 hard for higher cloud tonality and smoothed water flowing effects. Labrador Park, Singapore.

One of the most blessed evenings on a rainy December period. Guess I was lucky. Anyway I'm adding and changing my borders to a better format for all my photos. This makes it look like a picture frame!
 

Last edited:
6549691137_e436a3bc72_b.jpg


Flow Me Away

3 Image HDR/DRI using GND 0.9 soft + GND 0.6 hard for higher cloud tonality and smoothed water flowing effects. Labrador Park, Singapore.

One of the most blessed evenings on a rainy December period. Guess I was lucky. Anyway I'm adding and changing my borders to a better format for all my photos. This makes it look like a picture frame!


Yesterday was indeed a beautiful sunset after the gloomy past 2 days.
Nice picture. :)
 

Thanks!! :D

Pinholecam... Have we meet in real life before? :think: Sorry my memory is kinda fuzzy. lol
 

Hi saDdyJ86! :)

GND stands for Graduated Neutral Density. These numbers, 0.6 and 0.9 denote how "dark" the dark parts are, 0.6 is brighter than 0.9, and 0.3 and the brightest of the lot. :) They are measured in stops, that correspond to the EV values on your camera. A GND is not a "function" that can be found on camera, but rather a rectangular (or square) piece of resin (Call it plastic if you will) that contain the dark and a clear side. :)

Basically, a GND darkens the sky because of the limited dynamic range of the camera. Thus also allowing slower shutter speeds and certain effects that usually "enhances" the sky to suit the dynamic range of what we see in our eyes.

GNDs come in "hard" and "soft" setups. Hard, as the name implies, a straight horizontal change with little or no graduation from the dark to the clear side. It looks something like this:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/17/424417.jpg

Soft GNDs, as the name implies, have longer gradation from dark to the clear side. The Soft GND is useful for situations where irregularity of the background or horizon exists; ie. mountains and buildings. To use a hard GND will create a straight gradation across the scene and will not look right at all. A soft GND looks like this:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/18/424418.jpg

Hope this helps. :D

am i right to say it somehow like a polarizing filter? and by the way, how you do those hdr images? thanks. (:
 

Last edited:
Well not entirely so, a polarizing filter enhances the contrast of the sky in short. The GND "darkens" the sky to equalise the exposure of what we see in our vision to the camera. ;)

Well there are many ways of achieving HDR and DRI images, you can do them manually or use via software like Photomatix or Oloneo. Oloneo is by far the most realistic but it's expensive IMO and since I gotten the hang of doing it manually. :)
Always remember that, we use HDR/DRI as means to further equalise and distribute the exposure and lighting more accurately as what our vision permits. The camera has limited dynamic range as compared to our eyes, so DRI and HDR is used.
 

6554752071_e2c4d5bbd8_b.jpg


Ghostly Rhythm

7 Image HDR/DRI using GND 0.9 soft + GND 0.6 hard for increased tonality of the sky and clouds. Rocks manually HDRed and toned contrast. Labrador Park, Singapore.

One of the last shots of the best day in the middle of a rainy December period rarely seen. As the sun sets down the horizon, the hour of excitement begins as the environment and sky around me turned to a tone of violent orange.
 

Last edited:
I like the second shot's composition a lot more. Wish the bottom right rock was complete in the picture though.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top