I think there are 2 points that needs to be addressed.
1. Stealth in terms of blending in and not being noticed. Whether taking a photo or just walking around.
This does not affect the picture being taken, but rather the photographer. If you carry a rangefinder on the streets today, it will get more attention than if you are wearing a 100 carat diamond necklace.
I have had strangers walk across a road just to ask me if I am using a Leica, I have had Australians stopping me to ask if they can look at my M9, I have had Germans in Japan asking why I am using a Leica instead of a Canon, Nikon or Sony and then smacking me on the back congratulating me on my excellent taste and of course, I have had people come up and ask, why I still shoot with film, when I am using a film body? The incidents are too many to list. I might as well have a floating sign over my head that says, please talk to me.
As a result, I now carry my camera in an easily accessible bag and pull it out when I want to take a shot, slower yes, but alot less hassle.
In comparison, how many times have I been approached when I am carrying my DSLR openly via a Black Rapid strap? ZERO!
2. When taking a picture, how does your subject react?
On the flip side, a rangefinder is definitely less threatening than a SLR. You can point it at someone and almost always get away with it. With a SLR, people run, they wave you off and sometimes they get angry.
As mentioned previously, the most important thing is also how the photographer behaves.
1. Stealth in terms of blending in and not being noticed. Whether taking a photo or just walking around.
This does not affect the picture being taken, but rather the photographer. If you carry a rangefinder on the streets today, it will get more attention than if you are wearing a 100 carat diamond necklace.
I have had strangers walk across a road just to ask me if I am using a Leica, I have had Australians stopping me to ask if they can look at my M9, I have had Germans in Japan asking why I am using a Leica instead of a Canon, Nikon or Sony and then smacking me on the back congratulating me on my excellent taste and of course, I have had people come up and ask, why I still shoot with film, when I am using a film body? The incidents are too many to list. I might as well have a floating sign over my head that says, please talk to me.
As a result, I now carry my camera in an easily accessible bag and pull it out when I want to take a shot, slower yes, but alot less hassle.
In comparison, how many times have I been approached when I am carrying my DSLR openly via a Black Rapid strap? ZERO!
2. When taking a picture, how does your subject react?
On the flip side, a rangefinder is definitely less threatening than a SLR. You can point it at someone and almost always get away with it. With a SLR, people run, they wave you off and sometimes they get angry.
As mentioned previously, the most important thing is also how the photographer behaves.
Last edited: