I agree~!Originally posted by tert
I think they're one of the most friendly people i've ever meet. They take the effort to adjust your photos to its best (so they say shooting with film is a partnership between the lab and you). Not only that, they've always taken the trouble to sit down with me and review my photos: "this shot is overexposed"; "that's underexposed"; "it will look better like this"; "you should always open up 1/2 - 1 stop with film". And indeed, i've learned alot from them... (and i'm sure many will agree).
Originally posted by Bean
I agree~!
Wolfgang, as a moderator, I guess it is not very nice to crash into this thread to question the intentions of the photographers signing up. Maybe you could start another thread to discuss the issue...![]()
Originally posted by Wolfgang
Honestly, portraiture can be practised anywhere with anyone... you DO NOT need to shoot a professional model to come up with a keeper... ;p
Originally posted by mervlam
The main reason why, i believe, that a professional model is engaged is because they are in a better position to come up with poses than non-professionals.
To put it crudely, it's NOT YOUR BUSINESS to care whether they engage a professional model or not. You have your opinions and they have theirs. Anyway, thanks for reminding not to sterotype portraiture with glamour photography.
No offence taken, I hope.
Please don't be a wet blanket here. If you can to discuss this issue, please do it in another thread.
... but this will die here.
Originally posted by Wolfgang
No reason to continue this in another thread since neither one of you can look at this objectively and understand why this was brought up in this thread.
Do you find it polite and in accordance with forum rules questioning the intentions of others in mass participation thread? Isn't it the rule that off-topic discussions should preferably be started elsewhere? You could have started another thread on this you know?
Like i have said once, and i will say it again. This isn't wasn't meant to crash this thread nor discourage people from participating in paid shoots. It's just the intentions of such photographers that i question.
Does it matter here? I believe everyone has already heard about your experiences and your side of the story. But to go on and on harping about, to the extent of barging into other peoples threads to continue harping is really unbecoming and smacks of a certain degree of bitterness on your part. Even if these people are going there to ogle so to speak, they have not offended you in any way previously and do not need to answer your query in any way.
Beside, if the models that are engaged are going to all males, i'll actually like to see how many male photographers would willingly jump right in and pay for the shoot/lesson.
accepted... so pls..... no more essay from you on this tread!;pOriginally posted by YSLee
Whoops, so sorry bluestrike, didn't see your post when I started on my reply, salah salah! :embrass: No more posts from me!
Originally posted by darktimus
where is Stanley's place ?
don't know where is it :dunno:
Originally posted by keicheng
Hi,
I am new to model shooting (in fact kind of new in photography also). Just wonder why there is such condition?
i.e., "You'd be asked also to sign a agreement form stating that you are not to use the pictures for any commercial purpose; non-circulating on the mass media like the internet... "
I am thinking to join this shooting but I don't like the condition. I usually offer my pictures for free to whoever wants to use.
"You'd be asked also to sign a agreement form stating that you are not to use the pictures for any commercial purpose; non-circulating on the mass media like the internet... "
I am thinking to join this shooting but I don't like the condition. I usually offer my pictures for free to whoever wants to use.