Pro Image said:Simon,
Thanks for the editing the title.
MISS DI and STEVEN YEE of PSS,
As stated clearly on the original thread that the only REPRESENTATIVE of STANLEY LIM COLOUR CENTRE IS AS FOLLOWS:-
1) PRO IMAGE
2) TOTO38
3) BLITZ28
Other than the nick I mentioned above, none of those who is in your threads is the representative of SLCC. So far none of us have tried to habour any bad intention in any of your thread. We have not request or ask any members in CS to created trouble in your thread. You should know better than us that CS is an open forum. So there will always be people conducting strange behaviour.
WE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE ANOTHER OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT THAT WE HIRE PROFESSIONAL MAKE-UP ARTIST TO MAKE-UP ALL OUR MODELS. WE HAVE NEVER HAD A MODEL WITHOUT MAKE-UP BEFORE OUR SHOOT. PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANY ASSUMPTION THAT IT IS NOT. WE TAKE GREAT PRIDE ON ALL OUR MODELS AND WE ALWAYS GIVE THE BEST TO OUR PARTICIPANTS.
hey hey, cool down. This is getting personal.
This is from my own personal point of view. I do not know what triggered you to have this thread, and have PSS activity in scrutiny by this thread of yours.
I am utterly confused, perturbed, bewildered and ......
I also do not know how the thread http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=121369&page=2&pp=20 which is on a PSS studio shoot can lead ProImage to have conclusions like this.
And perhaps you can clear the air by being more specific as to who you are referring to with regards to your claims, and i am indeed curious of all threads, you use ours as an example. This is certainly interesting. Pls enlighten me. I have briefly read the PSS studio thread and I see no reason for this hoo ha.
And what made me more curious is the purpose of this particular post where you said you did not ask anyone to make trouble at our thread. In the first place, we did not even comment about it. This indeed came as a surprise for me.
Once again, I am confused, and confused.