Spot the error in today's Sony Alpha ad in ST (Aug 12 2006)
- Thread starter Timber Wolf
- Start date
- Status
If they only made mistake with price, think we can all gain from it.
But they also make mistake with the specs of the camera. Wasted! :bsmilie:
But they also make mistake with the specs of the camera. Wasted! :bsmilie:
really got to give it to sony for their marketing approach...frankly speaking, will u guys buy the A100 for the "different battery position" thingy? i thought they should be emphasizing more of the other features e.g. anti dust and the anti shake, who should appeal to the hobbyists..
mattlock said:
:bsmilie: :bsmilie: Don't forget, the added bonus of a thinner circuit board - let's you take better pictures !
Unfortunate once again.
We all know what the A100 is potentially capable of, esp Minolta users, with the benefit of a newer CCD and the consistency of ADI.
However, Sony choose to screw all these instead with big bold marketing claims (which we all know it isn't really important).
We all know what the A100 is potentially capable of, esp Minolta users, with the benefit of a newer CCD and the consistency of ADI.
However, Sony choose to screw all these instead with big bold marketing claims (which we all know it isn't really important).
on hindsight, what's the remote possibility that ST makes the error in print? what would be the consequence should they made that error? compensate for the error or something?
Cheesecake
Senior Member
tis one sibeh pain!Soldi said:
alot of mainstream consumer will not want to buy a 1.2mp DSLR!!! even the antique Nikon D1/H is 2.1mp!:bsmilie:
2.5 LCD Monitor?
It has two and a half screens? :what: :sweat: :bsmilie:
Think they forgot to include the " or In. :think:
It has two and a half screens? :what: :sweat: :bsmilie:
Think they forgot to include the " or In. :think:
Cheesecake
Senior Member
it's all about ergonomics
how the camera feels in your hands
errors are very bad, it is not SPH's fault, creative will get the full blame
how the camera feels in your hands
errors are very bad, it is not SPH's fault, creative will get the full blame
ortega said:
dat's wat i said since morning... but no one seemed to notice. why the ad appear in ST means SPH's fault??? ads r by advertisers who may engage creative agencies mah...
on 2nd look at the errors in the ad.. the 2 has been stated.
1. 1.2mp
2. 2.5 lcd
is this the 3rd one?
3 frame/sec, shouldnt it be 3 frames/sec? or is it only me. :think:
1. 1.2mp
2. 2.5 lcd
is this the 3rd one?
3 frame/sec, shouldnt it be 3 frames/sec? or is it only me. :think:
- Status
Similar threads
