Man.. will try when I have the budget for it
Two photos from STGCC.. CZ28mm F2
This is Hollywood or the Pentax version of the same lens?
Last edited:
Sony A7/(r) image sharing thread #2
- Thread starter pinholecam
- Start date
- Status
This is Hollywood or the Pentax version of the same lens?
yeah I am more keen on the faster CV21but it's pricey, the f4 seems good and I have cv35 so kinda having 2nd thoughts about it maybe the CV15? lolz
Maybe I switch to OM 21mm f3.5 then. Heard it's pretty good, small and light (less than 200g). Anyone tried it before?
albertri
Senior Member
thanks for the info bro I saw the 21/1.8 looks good but I have not really look at it closely
albertri
Senior Member
woohoo Hollywood version nice lens...
albertri
Senior Member
hmmm Oly glass are generally good lenses
even their Pen-F lenses seems to work with A7/r (some with slight vignette some with nothing at all)Also cannot.... (Edit : this refers to CV21/3.5 a slr lens)
At least for me.
This lens characteristic is center sharp with lots of field curvature and much less sharpness off center.
Its pancake of course, which is the good part.
So if you plan to use this lens as a landscape lens or capture details than need all round sharpness, it's not the best candidate.
IMO, just get a slr 20/2.8.
Not ttoo ex, wide enough in most cases, f2.8 if needed, not much issues, still ok in size and still ok overall sharpness.
CV21/1.8 seems to work too, but more costly and back to square with the size.
My few cents
Edit :
Ok, sorry for misreading the lens as CV21/3.5 SLR version.
If its the Oly 21/3.5, a good comparison is here :
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1314642
Still about the same conclusion to me though.
YMMV of course
Last edited:
albertri
Senior Member
yeah CV 21/1.8 looks good so far but pricey
I removed my post.
Thought he was asking about the cv21/3.5 for slr
albertri
Senior Member
I removed my post.
Thought he was asking about the cv21/3.5 for slr
I was the one bro who is keen of CV21/1.8 hehe still good reply
Erm Hollywood??
albertri
Senior Member
Keep the photos coming....
]\
DSC0087220140629ILCE-7 by jenkwang, on Flickr
A7+Helios44
21/1.8 seems ok, but I've not done careful 100% check on internet samples since I don't plan to get one.
I updated the post with some info on the OM21/3.5 too.
The other thing I feel about OM21 and OM lenses in general is that they are expensive for an orphan mount, which is why I would rather settle for any other 20/2.8 or just get a CV21/1.8.
You sell to me... its a junk lens....
http://www.eoshd.com/2013/07/60-pen...s-by-designer-of-stanley-kubricks-nasa-glass/
]\DSC0087220140629ILCE-7 by jenkwang, on Flickr
A7+Helios44
21/1.8 seems ok, but I've not done careful 100% check on internet samples since I don't plan to get one.
I updated the post with some info on the OM21/3.5 too.
The other thing I feel about OM21 and OM lenses in general is that they are expensive for an orphan mount, which is why I would rather settle for any other 20/2.8 or just get a CV21/1.8.
You sell to me... its a junk lens....
http://www.eoshd.com/2013/07/60-pen...s-by-designer-of-stanley-kubricks-nasa-glass/
Last edited:
albertri
Senior Member
Keep the photos coming.... https://flic.kr/p/pbeZMe]\ DSC0087220140629ILCE-7 by jenkwang, on Flickr A7+Helios44 21/1.8 seems ok, but I've not done careful 100% check on internet samples since I don't plan to get one. I updated the post with some info on the OM21/3.5 too. The other thing I feel about OM21 and OM lenses in general is that they are expensive for an orphan mount, which is why I would rather settle for any other 20/2.8 or just get a CV21/1.8. You sell to me... its a junk lens....
Yeah bro seen some cb21/1.8 photos seem good but also has not did a deep dive check on pix.
Bro I got the #1 Q number for the Hollywood lens hehe
Good point.
Back to pics
OM 24 @ f5.6 on my way back yesterday:
VC35 f1.4 with close focus:
A7+Industar 61
No, its not my cup! by jenkwang, on Flickr
Just in case one is wondering... no, its not my cup
DSC0308420140912ILCE-7 by jenkwang, on Flickr
DSC0309220140912ILCE-7 by jenkwang, on Flickr
No, its not my cup! by jenkwang, on Flickr
Just in case one is wondering... no, its not my cup
DSC0308420140912ILCE-7 by jenkwang, on Flickr
DSC0309220140912ILCE-7 by jenkwang, on Flickr
lai bro sell to me this lens cheap
Keep the photos coming....
You sell to me... its a junk lens....
http://www.eoshd.com/2013/07/60-pen...s-by-designer-of-stanley-kubricks-nasa-glass/
you all can afford it lah. hehe..
A7+Industar 61
Just in case one is wondering... no, its not my cup
Nice mug picture.. where did you went to shoot in the last picturE?
chipvn
Senior Member
Ok. Just to provide you guys a quick reference on the performance of the Voigtlander Ultron 21mm f1.8 Aspherical on A7 at landscape aperture range f5.6-f8 (although this lens is optimized for wide open shooting at f1.8: center sharpness is excellent at f1.8). These 2 shots taken hand-held at f5.6 and at f8 with the Sony Lens compensation app vignetting turned-on to +6 (maximum +16), Actually, at f8 there is almost no vignetting so no need to compensate. These 2 shots are out of camera Jpeg and I provide the link for the full size original image below each photo for further reference. No color shift correction or any further processing applied.
Sorry, no time to bring it out for a nicer shot!
Hope it help.
Sorry, no time to bring it out for a nicer shot!
Hope it help.
1. @f5.6:
Full size photo: https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3862/15029662900_9e446d1ebb_o.jpg
2. @f8:
Full size photo: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5588/15216328315_c5533a1a83_o.jpg
Full size photo: https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3862/15029662900_9e446d1ebb_o.jpg
2. @f8:
Full size photo: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5588/15216328315_c5533a1a83_o.jpg
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
