albertri
Senior Member
So many good options from d slr era. Pentax. Minolta. Olympus. Vivitar. Slowly research.
Yeah for no AF

So many good options from d slr era. Pentax. Minolta. Olympus. Vivitar. Slowly research.
Yeah for no AFfor AF only few in A-Mount AF lenses would match the Minolta. In terms of price and IQ
is the nikons 50 1.2 bad??.. my friend and myself considering between the 2.....
Nikon 50 1.2 good but i dunno why i like Voigtlander lens especially when i shoot in black and white. and the Nikon lens with adapter will become much longer... for the 50 mm lens i am considering the CV 50 1.5, Sony FE 55 1.8 (dunno will miss the bokeh or not)..... unless i can get a 58 1.2 hahah
AF makes u dependent. AF makes u weak. AF makes u go to d dark side. Woohoo
Noct nikkor 58/1.2?? Woohoo. Tatz d lens man!!
Hard to get la..... dunno new 58 1.4 can fight or not..
hehe these are some lens must have brolike in FE the 55/1.8 and in Minolta AF lenses these
.
Ikr. Now at vivo. Using fe 55 as a lazy shoot about lens at d moment here. Haha.
Bro saw you have both FE55 and CV 50 1.5 . what do you think of both lens ? which one is better ?
Bro saw you have both FE55 and CV 50 1.5 . what do you think of both lens ? which one is better ?
Haaa there is no better. Fe55 offers AF and edge to edge sharpness wide open with a clinical rendering (less character). CV 50 has better bokeh and rendering (more classic) but is MF. Sharp in the center and corners sharp by f2.8. Most importantly the cv50 comes in chrome Hehe.
Both can co-exist in my gear bag.
Aiya Summilux noneed to compare liao, when i mount it into my camera immediately i notice the difference in the picture due to it micro contrast. wah you also have D4S ah..