Songs for video need license ???
- Thread starter foryasake
- Start date
- Status
voldisinarta
Member
By law, if you receive payment for that video, you have to pay copyright for the songs inside. To get it, you have to approach the song's record label representative in S'pore.
... but almost no one care about this ;p
... but almost no one care about this ;p
Last edited:
MDA has charged people who violates IP law.
Read some of this links for more info:
LINK 1
LINK 2
LINK 3
It is suggested that even Utube stuff could be in violation. so like PCK says "DON"T PLAY PLAY EH"
A royalthy paid music CD only cost about $100 for about 10 tracks but you can use it for a lifetime.
Some are paid as you use in 30 secs block. Try Big Bang Fuzz at Tg Pagar, there's also a couple of other music library available.
Adobe and Sony has some software to help with that but can cost a hole in your pocket.
Read some of this links for more info:
LINK 1
LINK 2
LINK 3
It is suggested that even Utube stuff could be in violation. so like PCK says "DON"T PLAY PLAY EH"
A royalthy paid music CD only cost about $100 for about 10 tracks but you can use it for a lifetime.
Some are paid as you use in 30 secs block. Try Big Bang Fuzz at Tg Pagar, there's also a couple of other music library available.
Adobe and Sony has some software to help with that but can cost a hole in your pocket.
Last edited:
V
vince123123
Guest
V
vince123123
Guest
Can you point me to the specific areas in those three links which tells you that "MDA has charged people for who violates (sic) IP law"?
A far as I know, MDA does not initiate any such proceedings, whether or civil. Civil proceedings are initiated by the rights holders themselves, and criminal proceedings (which I assume you mean since you use the word "charged"), are initiated by the Attorney General.
If something has changed, do let us know.
A far as I know, MDA does not initiate any such proceedings, whether or civil. Civil proceedings are initiated by the rights holders themselves, and criminal proceedings (which I assume you mean since you use the word "charged"), are initiated by the Attorney General.
If something has changed, do let us know.
V
vince123123
Guest
I am happy to see that there are people who are starting to appreciate the nuances of copyright (and other IP) laws.
Yes, reproduction rights and broadcasting rights are indeed separate aspects of copyright creatures and hence, one needs to look carefully at the license terms.
That said, I'm not really sure that broadcasting rights are really required for the usual wedding video. I'll reckon most are not really broadcasted.
Yes, reproduction rights and broadcasting rights are indeed separate aspects of copyright creatures and hence, one needs to look carefully at the license terms.
That said, I'm not really sure that broadcasting rights are really required for the usual wedding video. I'll reckon most are not really broadcasted.
I think MDA do not take legal actions against offenders, just as an advisory I think. It's the publishing firms / recording companies / agencies representing the artistes that actually does the legal stuff.
Anyway, the reason that no legal proceedings has been taken against wedding videos has been the fact that it's still too small a market. Just wait till one of these bigger wedding studio gets nab then everyone will wise up.
LOL
Anyway, the reason that no legal proceedings has been taken against wedding videos has been the fact that it's still too small a market. Just wait till one of these bigger wedding studio gets nab then everyone will wise up.
LOL
wow.. it that so? wedding only earn few hundreds and fined few thousand? :bigeyes:
so next time the music license cost must impose to the wedding couple lor!?
chanxj
New Member
Well, ur supposed to. Business model must be feasible.
V
vince123123
Guest
Abetment is only relevant if there is a criminal offence.
V
vince123123
Guest
They will be responsible for different liabilities. The person making it is not the ONLY person responsible.
- Status
