So now the question is: Would you buy the A900?

A850 vs A900. Buy which one?


Results are only viewable after voting.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Those two differences in specifications are good to have - that is, for me - if there's a cheap, good conditioned a900 appearing in the market with a pricing that's close to a brand new a850 - if not, I'd buy the a850 for my studio work.
 

There are only 3 differences.

Viewfinder prism:
A900 - 100%
A850 - 98%

FPS:
A900 - 5fps
A850 - 3fps

Picture Size
A900 - 24 megapixels
A850 - 21 megapixels

And then, the Price.
 

Last edited:
Yes, both are using the same sensor.

So essentially, for a difference of $1.1k (or thereabouts, according to the prices I saw a few days back), you get 2% more viewfinder coverage, 2 fps faster rate.

Is there anything else we're missing out on?

Speed of file transfer I guess... the A900 is really super fast with a fast card like a Ducati 8GB from Sandisk...
 

Think the pcb should be the same... just some components remove here or there.

The same goes for the 2xx/3xx, 5xx series... 8xx/9xx should share the same pcb, just some components there, some not there...

This is similar to how home theater systems are built en-masse - some has XM radio, some has RDS... etc etc, sony is applying that to their cameras as well - a very smart move to flood the market with a lot of models currently - there are 7 models on market, but they only need 4 main chassis.
 

I see no reason not to buy A 900 if the prices are attractive , It is always the main reason.:bsmilie:
 

I see no reason not to buy A 900 if the prices are attractive , It is always the main reason.:bsmilie:

As usual, another irrelevant statement from you.

Of course if it is cheap, who won't buy? Then I wouldn't even need to start this thread. As it is right now, there is a price difference of more than SGD1k.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top