AncientMariner said:Since when do I have a habit of whacking and why should I?:think:
But thanks. Long distance shot?
Since when I am referring 'you' as AncientMariner????
Yes, very very long........
AncientMariner said:Since when do I have a habit of whacking and why should I?:think:
But thanks. Long distance shot?
AncientMariner said:For instance, if a customer walks into your studio for a portrait wearing clothes and makeup not to your liking, are you going to send the customer home or just shoot for fun? Hardly professional, right?
Then if you do shoot for fun, as you say, and the pics do not come out "siew siew", do you not hand over any photos?
Deadpoet said:Just 2 comments. Whatever you did, your handling of skin tone sucks, the model is either too red, too pink, too bronze, too unatural, too bad.
What is this obcession of sticking shiny little thingys underneath the eye. First of all, execution not good, it's inappropriate for the look, it's getting boring.
Oh, sorry, 1 more comment, in your first picture, the make up around the eyes, particularily the one with the shiny silver thingy, look ghaustly, then after a few more looks, I know what it looks like, a Borg from Star Trek!
7 of 9 was hot, but let's not forget the Borg queen either.kenzi said:Hey...
Hope you ain't implying borgs aren't attractive. Some Borgs are hot... See 7-of-9 from ST Voyager..... :bsmilie:
kenzi said:Hey...
Hope you ain't implying borgs aren't attractive. Some Borgs are hot... See 7-of-9 from ST Voyager..... :bsmilie:
Youhong said:I have to agree with DP's point that the photographer has to be in control and that there is nothing wrong being demanding during the shoot. However, I would like to use the following example to bring out my views:
[Please read above post ... didn't want to quote the whole piece here ... ]
Just my 2 cent worth...
Long Thai Bean said:Anyway ... i think your 2 cents worth may start another whole round of debates ... and more responses ....
Just when i thot his thread was cooling down and proceeding onto a discussion on ST and the Borgs .... haiz ....
RGDs
you are so right ... I was about to start a 7 of 9 thread, but then .......Long Thai Bean said:Anyway ... i think your 2 cents worth may start another whole round of debates ... and more responses ....
Just when i thot his thread was cooling down and proceeding onto a discussion on ST and the Borgs .... haiz ....
Youhong said:...
Coming back to this SLCC shoot... This is only a $60 shoot. 6 models, 2 outfits ...plus MUA and leader. I think we can't demand anything more about that already...
Coming to the point about the models. It is like $10 per model. Don't expect them to "do and pose as I commanded". If they just don't want to do it, so be it. .... ... Our task as the photographer is also to guide them into doing good poses for the cameras and from there, they will learn and gain experience....
For the MUA, again, about money. You want something to your liking? Pay more. ...
In conclusion, I think that everything comes down to money lah... You want more, pay more...
Youhong said:I have to agree with DP's point that the photographer has to be in control and that there is nothing wrong being demanding during the shoot. However, I would like to use the following example to bring out my views:
(Ok, I didn't really check out the price of traveling in the MRT)
Let's say you're paying $1.40 which will bring you from Boon Lay to City hall. Of course, you expect to reach City Hall. If you can only go to Dover or even just Jurong East, you definitely have to voice out because it is maybe say a $0.60 trip. For that, go ahead and make a fuss out of it and call me, I'll join in to whack too. While we're demanding, don't expect to go to Changi Airport or Pasir Ris with that $1.40 because the trip may be $2.40. That's too much on our part to demand to that extend. Maybe can push a little further to Bugis or Kallang, but not too much... You're only pay that much. Know how much you can demand from what you pay too. If you want more, pay more. That's the rule of thumb isn't it? "Yi fen qian, yi fen huo" like DP mentioned that we should expect the same thing as the sample given to us and not something less. BUT, we can't expect something more too!
Coming back to this SLCC shoot... This is only a $60 shoot. 6 models, 2 outfits (din't say that there's a bikini shoot, so all the shorts, and scarf covering thingy wouldn't apply) plus MUA and leader. I think we can't demand anything more about that already...
Coming to the point about the models. It is like $10 per model. Don't expect them to "do and pose as I commanded". If they just don't want to do it, so be it. But if I'm paying $100 per model, I would definitely demand something more then. Of course, it would be good if they can pose as the photographer as suggested to them which benefits both. This comes to being professionalism. Many newbie wannabe models din't know what to expect in this kind of shoot and that they think that being model is easy. I think this is a common misunderstanding they have in mind. Our task as the photographer is also to guide them into doing good poses for the cameras and from there, they will learn and gain experience.
For the MUA, again, about money. You want something to your liking? Pay more. Then I believe that the MUA don't mind redoing and redoing the make-up until you're happy. I suggest that a portray photographer should also learn some basic make-up too. At least it would be a "good to have" skill... Don't you agree? In that case, you can also DIY too.
In conclusion, I think that everything comes down to money lah... You want more, pay more. For this kind of mass shoot, don't forget that you're not the only one paying. If everyone wants to go to Changi from Boon Lay with just $1.40, that will be very bad... Just "give and take"... Of course, these points may not apply to TFCD...
Just my 2 cent worth...
jcho said:
Del_CtrlnoAlt said:just thinking... does this 2 look alike? no offense here...
Del_CtrlnoAlt said:just thinking... does this 2 look alike? no offense here...
Bobman said:I think no good to do this type of comprision la....btw, I noticed something now. Please ask the model to adjust any loose fitting before you shoot. I dun think it look nice.. Photographers sometimes must be observant.
If I were the model, I'll feel insulted and hurt... please don't hurt them this way.Del_CtrlnoAlt said:just thinking... does this 2 look alike? no offense here...
Ok, just a simple lesson in English. When you write "you" in a post in a public forum but addressed to nobody in particular, please note it is taken as a collective noun to mean "any or all of you".Bobman said:Since when I am referring 'you' as AncientMariner????
Thought so. Interesting to see that you chose a long telephoto shot to post. The pose in http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f188/monoerotica/j2.jpg looked a lot like a semi-nude version of what someone had a model do for a pic in a review on the Tamron 200-500mm lens. I have not used that lens for a portrait shot but here's one at about the same distance as yours done with a "prosumer digicam" shot handheld at 12X also about 2 yrs ago:Bobman said:Yes, very very long........
Bobman said:For you to whack la......
Nude Inside.......
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f188/monoerotica/j2.jpg
AncientMariner said:Since when do I have a habit of whacking and why should I?:think:
But thanks. Long distance shot?
Bobman said:Since when I am referring 'you' as AncientMariner????
Yes, very very long........
AncientMariner said:Ok, just a simple lesson in English. When you write "you" in a post in a public forum but addressed to nobody in particular, please note it is taken as a collective noun to mean "any or all of you".
Luval said:actually to correctly put forth , is that i have been to some shots also. the fact is some of them (photog) doesnt have a damna ideal how to pose a model at all... much less to tell the mua that the make up sucks.. not to mention that the mua herself sucks.. Alot of it boils down to the basic.. If they dun have the basic , the rest can forget about it.
Divine_Monk said:I thought its up to the photographer to bring the beauty in the pose of the model and make the best out of the make up and environment, and every pose the model is in has to come out good, irregardless of whether in your opinion is a good pose or bad pose?
That is a key differentiator from a professional photographer from a "amatuer" photographer that blames the model for not posing properly.
Duno... maybe I'm wrong. Maybe you are right that its everyone else's fault. Just my opinion.