sidetrack a little, does Sigma still have peeling problems?
Wow, 8-16. Its like the 12-24 for FF!
Yes, one less reason for FF owners to brag. :bsmilie:
Anyway, ALL these releases look VERY attractive. But the most pertinent question is: how good are they optically? If they are any good, I can no longer claim the Canon 10-22 and 17-55 f/2.8 IS have no competition in terms of optical performance and features. :bsmilie:
Hopefully, the (i) 8-16 can perform as well as the Canon 10-22 (ii) 17-50 f/2.8 OS does NOT behave like Tamron's 17-50 f/2.8 VR (iii) 85 f/1.4 performs as beautifully as Sigma's 50 f/1.4.
On nikon's 1.5x crop it IS 12mm. :bsmilie:8 is around 13mm for APS-C, so they still beat crop by 1mm! :bsmilie::bsmilie::bsmilie:
Just saw the MTF chart of the new 8-16. Looks VERY promising.
![]()
Ooops... I think Sigma has just aroused my earthly desires to upgrade and in the process destroyed my state of nirvana in the area of gear acqusition. :bsmilie:
EX series I suppose.
OH swee ah. If the price is right for the 70-200, it will be a must-grab for me! =x Where did you all find this news?