spenz said:I got mine for $320 brand new from MS Color la...
Just to let you guys know. Nikon Mount
i think it is a gd buy.
spenz said:I got mine for $320 brand new from MS Color la...
Just to let you guys know. Nikon Mount
icestrike said:yeah,sigma 70-300 APO DG macro is at a reasonable good price
tink i'm gonna get it soon with a canon close-up lens
can't wait
I have Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO MACRO DG. There is an earlier version called 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO SUPER II.LENS said:Hello, is this sigma 60-300 APO DG macro same with sigma 70-300 Macro Super APO II?
If no, then market price $320, mentioned in this thread earlier is for which lense?
Thank you.
LENS said:Hello, is this sigma 60-300 APO DG macro same with sigma 70-300 Macro Super APO II?
If no, then market price $320, mentioned in this thread earlier is for which lense?
Thank you.
Yes. If I am not wrong, Sigma website mentions this new coating on DG version. But many people doubt about it, they say it is likely marketing strategy to bring this old lens SIGMA 70-300mm APO MACRO SUPER II live again. But for safety, ask for DG version (same price mah...).hafele said:Identical lens I think. But the DG version with new coating for preventing flare from CCD reflects, which i think is sth quite good to have on DSLR.
gary wong said:which brand has to best 70-300mm ?
If the price between them is not much different, I think the output quality is not much different also. Sometime it is true, more expensive will result on better output quality. Sigma have extra MACRO function (this is my reason why I choose Sigma over Nikkor), while Nikkor doesn't have.ibnujang said:good question:thumbsup:
has anybody made a comparison between this sigma 70-300mm APO DG and nikkor 70-300mm G ?:think: